But does Bristol (where the question came from) actually support any
VO that still relies on WMS ?
(mainly t2k around here). CMS won't care as far as I can tell.
Cheers,
Daniela
On 10 January 2014 10:05, Ewan MacMahon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Christopher J. Walker [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 10 January 2014 09:14
>>
>> On 09/01/14 14:28, Ewan MacMahon wrote:
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
>> >> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeremy Coles
>> >>
>> >> The latest WLCG position on this was given by Maarten at the WLCG ops
>> >> meeting on Monday
>> >>
>> (https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LCG/WLCGDailyMeetingsWeek140106#Mond
>> ay):
>> >>
>> >
>> > What's not in Maarten's summary though, is a recommendation of what to
>> > actually do about it. My inclination is that everyone should upgrade,
>> > and any intermediate services (like WMSes) that are then broken
>> > because they've not upgraded, should just be fixed.
>>
>> I've done some tests on UK WMSs/CEs using dteam based on Maarten's scripts
>> at:
>>
>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind1401&L=LCG-
>> ROLLOUT&F=&S=&P=7211
>>
>> Executive summary: at the moment, only Imperial's WMSs are OK.
>>
>
> OK, so how does this sound as a plan:
> - Get the remaining UK WMSes upgraded,
> - Then upgrade all the UK service nodes
>
> At that point the only breakage will be for people who are using
> UK resources, via non UK WMSes, and only if those WMSes also haven't
> been updated. If I'm following this correctly, there's no downside
> to upgrading a WMS since they'll still work with non-upgraded CEs,
> the problem is only if you've got upgraded endpoints and out-of-date
> intermediate services.
>
> Ewan
--
Sent from the pit of despair
-----------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask]
HEP Group/Physics Dep
Imperial College
London, SW7 2BW
Tel: +44-(0)20-75947810
http://www.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/~dbauer/
|