Hi Matt,

With respect to the HyperK ticket for Glasgow, I was ready to ask Chris to test it today, but we had a power surge over the weekend which put us into downtime so I've been bringing the site back up. I'll ask for tests once I've checked that the WMS configurations are still good.

Cheers
Dave

On 25 Nov 2013, at 16:24, Matt Doidge <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hello everybody,
> 
> Blimmeration, it's 15.30 and I'm only just starting to look at 
> everybody's tickets. Hopefully this won't be too much of a rush job.
> 
> 41 Open UK tickets today.
> 
> Information System Tickets:
> RALPP, ECDF, Lancaster, Liverpool, UCL Brunel, RHUL and the Tier 1 all 
> got tickets about their information system (this is a prelude to 
> information system probes going into the SAM tests).
> I asked for some clarification in the Lancaster ticket, as our resource 
> bdiis are up to date and recently reconfigured, but as these tickets are 
> super-fresh don't panic about them.
> 
> RALPP
> https://ggus.eu/ws/ticket_info.php?ticket=99186 (25/11)
> Not a reflection on the site (the ticket is 10 minutes old at time of 
> writing), but the subject interested me "NAGIOS 
> *emi.cream.glexec.CREAMCE-JobSubmit-/ops/Role=pilot* failed on 
> heplnv146.pp.rl.ac.uk@UKI-SOUTHGRID-RALPP". Are glexec failures becoming 
> critical? Assigned (25/11)
> 
> Which reminds me, I'll be taking a look at all your (and my 
> own...*whimper*) glexec tickets next week.
> 
> https://ggus.eu/ws/ticket_info.php?ticket=98923 (15/11)
> Picking on RALPP again, this other (SHA2) nagios ticket got reopened. 
> Looks like you're just not publishing your dcache version. To the ldifs! 
> Reopened (25/11)
> 
> SUSSEX
> https://ggus.eu/ws/ticket_info.php?ticket=98882 (14/11)
> Emyr fixed Sussex's STORM (hang on, I thought Emyr had escaped?) The 
> site's been whitelisted for testing since the 21st, if things are 
> looking good I suggest closing this ticket. In progress (21/11)
> 
> SHEFFIELD
> https://ggus.eu/ws/ticket_info.php?ticket=98594 (4/11)
> This LHCB ticket, regarding file uploading troubles running at Sheffield 
> post SL6 upgrade, is looking a bit neglected. Does anyone else know of 
> any post-SL6 tweaks that they needed to apply (say a cheeky undocumented 
> rpm) to get LHCB to work after their move to SL6? In Progress (13/11)
> 
> cvmfs@RAL tickets
> https://ggus.eu/ws/ticket_info.php?ticket=98249 (SNO+)
> https://ggus.eu/ws/ticket_info.php?ticket=98122 (cern@school)
> Both of these tickets have received their first warning for being in the 
> "waiting for reply" state for too long.
> 
> https://ggus.eu/ws/ticket_info.php?ticket=97868 (t2k)
> T2K don't have software to put into their statum 0 yet, but would like 
> to test with a ROOT tarball. No word from Catalin over this modest 
> testing plan (at least on the ticket, you might be beavering away 
> offline on this). In progress (18/11)
> 
> https://ggus.eu/ws/ticket_info.php?ticket=97385 (hyperK)
> A similar story here (I think work is just progressing offline, 
> hopefully we haven't entered a nightmarish universe where anything not 
> documented in GGUS tickets doesn't happen-yet). In progress (18/11)
> 
> GLASGOW
> https://ggus.eu/ws/ticket_info.php?ticket=96234 (29/7)
> WMS support for HyperK at Glasgow. Chris spotted a problem, Dave said 
> he'd get on it on Monday (which unless Dave had a 9 day weekend was a 
> week ago). Any luck? In progress (15/11)
> 
> EFDA-JET
> https://ggus.eu/ws/ticket_info.php?ticket=97485 (21/9)
> I mention this LHCB ticket last week, as this recurring problem has 
> stumped everyone involved. The JET guys have asked LHCB for some 
> information to try to help them debug the problem.
> 
> 
> I've no doubt missed something, having rushed this out in half the time 
> I usually take, so I'll cover my shoddiness with my usual line that if 
> I've missed any tickets of interest, please bring them up at the meeting 
> or online.
> 
> Cheers,
> Matt