IMHO, while explaining binding affinity from a structure is fun, it does
not prove anything. Assuming that I understand your situation
correctly, you can (relatively) easily find out from experiment which
pocket has higher affinity. Just do soaks with different ligand
concentrations - the expectation is that the weaker binding site will
become partially occupied first.
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 04:58 +0000, Xiaodi Yu wrote:
> Hi Wei:
>
> Based on the structure, you can calculate the binding surface between
> the protein and the ligand. Maybe the two binding pockets will give
> you two different numbers. And the larger one usually can have the
> higher binding affinity. You also can analyse how the ligand
> interacts with the protein though hydrophobic or electrostatic
> interaction , etc? the last, you may also compare the b factors of
> the ligand or the protein binding pocket regions after you refining
> the structure. These things may give you some hints about which
> binding site is more strong.
>
> Dee
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 22:45:58 -0500
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] distinguish ligand binding sites within a
> protein
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Thank you so much for the suggestions, Tomas! Yes, my ligand is a
> small molecule. I have the crystal structure of the ligands bound to
> the protein, do I still need to computationally dock the ligand to the
> two pockets, can I calculate the parameters of binding directly using
> the crystal structure?
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Tomas Malinauskas
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear Wei Shi,
> is your ligand a small molecule? If it is a small molecule, I
> would
> try to computationally dock the small molecule to two pockets
> separately using AutoDock, and look at the estimated free
> energies of
> binding.
> Best wishes,
> Tomas
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Wei Shi
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I got the crystal structure of a transcription factor, and
> every monomer
> > binds two molecules of the same ligand in different binding
> pockets. And I
> > also did the ITC experiment, titrating the ligand into the
> protein, and got
> > a U-shaped curve. The binding affinity for the first binding
> site is higher
> > than the second binding site.
> > I am wondering whether I could computationally determine
> from the
> > protein-ligand complex structure that which binding site has
> higher affinity
> > for the ligand and correlate the binding sites with the
> parameters I got
> > from ITC experiment.
> > Thank you so much!
> >
> > Best,
> > Wei
>
>
>
--
Edwin Pozharski, PhD, Assistant Professor
University of Maryland, Baltimore
----------------------------------------------
When the Way is forgotten duty and justice appear;
Then knowledge and wisdom are born along with hypocrisy.
When harmonious relationships dissolve then respect and devotion arise;
When a nation falls to chaos then loyalty and patriotism are born.
------------------------------ / Lao Tse /
|