JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  November 2013

PHD-DESIGN November 2013

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Using expert reviewers for triangulation in qualitative research

From:

Priscilla Chueng-Nainby <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 26 Nov 2013 23:44:57 +0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (259 lines)

Hi Chris,

On the note of triangulation, this reference may fit your research in
addition to Luke's and Teena's:

Wilson, H.S. and Hutchinson, S.A. (2006) *Triangulation of Qualitative
Methods: Heiddeggerian Hermeneutics and Grounded Theory*, in Mixed Methods,
Bryman, A., Sage Publications Ltd, London, pp 243-254.

Some chapters/papers in this series of Alan Bryman's Mixed methods could
also be useful.

Priscilla



On 26 November 2013 16:08, Chris Rust <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Thanks Luke, that's a really helpful and thoughtful response and we'll
> give it some serious thought.
> The triangulation that I'm implying isn't quite what you are seeing as
> it's comparing the original researcher's observations of the event with the
> observations of the expert panel. It is a strategy for reinforcing the
> coding.
> But I would say it's fairly implicit as triangulation goes and I'm happy
> to say that the term is more a metaphor than a precise description in this
> case. We aren't explicitly comparing two sets of data, rather we are
> subsuming them into a single analysis and researcher's understanding of the
> events is emergent so it moves from something personal and latent to
> something shared and explicit but a bit messy then back to a personal
> conclusion which needs to be more coherent.
> It wouldn't be so interesting if it was any other way :o)
> Chris
>
> .........................Chris RustDriver, Nether Edge
> [log in to unmask]
>
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:28:13 +1100
> > From: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: Using expert reviewers for triangulation in qualitative
> research
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> >
> > Dear Chris,
> >
> > This note is more of a general thought on Triangulation and how expert
> > opinion can be used in argumentation.
> >
> > Triangulation refers to using multiple approaches to reduce bias of any
> one
> > approach and so to increase confidence in the findings. Denzin (cited in
> > Bryman, 2003) distinguished four types of triangulation.
> >
> > 1. Data Triangulation. Gathering data through several sampling
> strategies,
> > for example, collecting data from multiple cases.
> > 2. Investigator Triangulation. More than one researcher gathering and
> > interpreting data.
> > 3. Theoretical Triangulation. Using more than one theoretical position to
> > interpret data.
> > 4. Methodological Triangulation. Using more than one method to gather
> data.
> >
> > Methodological Triangulation tends to be the most common meaning of the
> > term. Methodological Triangulation usually aims to contrast methods, for
> > example, an interview and a questionnaire.
> >
> > From what I understand, you have collected two records. Record 1, a video
> > of some design activity. Record 2, a video of a meeting between a panel
> of
> > experts who are exposed to a stimulus, namely, Record 1.
> >
> > To me, this sounds more or less like Methodological Triangulation of
> > observation and focus group methods.
> >
> > I think using the two records as Data Triangulation for an investigation
> > into collaboration, i.e. video 1 observed collaboration and the experts
> > "collaborated" during their discussion in video 2, would be problematic
> > because the two cases are too different to be compared.
> >
> > Selecting a sample of experts for the focus group is an appeal to expert
> > opinion. Arguments based on expert testimony are inherently more
> subjective
> > than deductively valid arguments or inductively confirmed arguments based
> > on evidence that is highly probably. An appeal to expert opinion should
> not
> > be seen an a substitute for getting factual evidence, that being the
> case,
> > expert testimony can be a valuable guide to seek information. Of course,
> > appeal to expert testimony is used extensively in law.
> >
> > An argument based on an appeal to expert opinion can evaluated using
> series
> > of critical questions (Walton, 2006, p. 88). How credible is the he/she
> as
> > a source? Is he/she an expert in the field that he/she is asserting
> > something about? Is he/she personally reliable as a source? Is his/her
> > testimony consistent with what other experts assert? Is the expert's
> > assertion based on evidence?
> >
> > In this situation, Data Triangulation would be criticised for subscribing
> > to a naive realist position because it assumes that sets of data from
> quite
> > different methods and contexts can be unambiguously compared. However, as
> > Methodological Triangulation the observation and expert opinion to can be
> > seen to add richness and complexity to an inquiry.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Luke
> >
> >
> > Bryman, A. (2003). Triangulation. *The Sage encyclopedia of social
> science
> > research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage*.
> >
> > Walton, D. N. (2006). *Fundamentals of critical argumentation*.
> Cambridge;
> > New York: Cambridge University Press.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 26 November 2013 08:34, Teena Clerke <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Chris,
> > >
> > > while not in the area of design research or ‘expert review',
> collaborative
> > > reflexive video research in health communication is a well established
> > > field that might be helpful. I recommend the work of Rick Iedema and
> > > Katherine Carroll, of the Centre for Health Communication at the
> University
> > > of Technology, Sydney (UTS) – see below – and Nick Hopwood, my
> colleague in
> > > the Centre for Research in Learning and Change at UTS. Nick and I
> worked
> > > together on video ethnography – one paper below.
> > >
> > > You might also look at Gillian Rose’s visual methods and Sarah Pink’s
> work
> > > on visual methodologies. And papers presented at the recent Visual
> > > Methodologies conference in September this year in Wellington NZ, at
> which
> > > Sarah presented.
> > >
> > > I hope this is helpful,
> > > cheers, teena
> > >
> > > Hopwood, N. (In press). Using video to trace the embodied and material
> in
> > > a study of health practice. Qualitative Research Journal.
> > >
> > > Juhasz A, Heath C & Iedema R (2009) Post-script: the significance of
> video
> > > research methodology for health and social science. International
> Journal
> > > for Multiple Research Approaches 3(3): 321-324.
> > >
> > > Iedema R, Merrick E, Rajbhandari D, Gardo A, Stirling A, Herkes R.
> (2009)
> > > Viewing the taken-for-granted from under a different aspect: a
> video-based
> > > method in pursuit of patient safety. International Journal for Multiple
> > > Research Approaches. 3(3), pp. 290-301.
> > >
> > > Carroll, K., Iedema, R., & Kerridge, R. (2008). Reshaping ICU ward
> round
> > > practices using video reflexive ethnography. Qualitative Health
> Research,
> > > 18(3), 380-390.
> > >
> > > Iedema, R., Forsyth, R., Georgiou, A., Braithwaite, J., and Westbrook,
> J.
> > > (2007) Video research in health: Visibilizing the effects of
> computerizing
> > > clinical care. Qualitative Research Journal. 6(2): pp. 15-30.
> > >
> > > Iedema, R., Long, D., Forsyth, R., & Lee, B. (2006). Visibilizing
> clinical
> > > work: Video ethnography in the contemporary hospital. Health Sociology
> > > Review. 15(2): 156-168.
> > >
> > > Delaney,G., Jacob, S., Iedema, R., Winters,M. and Barton,  M. (2004),
> “A
> > > Comparison of Face-to-face and Video-conferenced Multi-disciplinary
> > > Clinical meetings.” Australasian Radiology 48: 487-492
> > > Pink, S. (2001). Doing visual ethnography: images, media, and
> > > representation in research. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
> > >
> > > Pink, S. (Ed.). (2012). Advances in visual ethnography. London;
> Thousand
> > > Oaks; Singapore: Sage Publications Ltd.
> > >
> > >
> > > Rose, G. (2012). Visual methodologies. An introduction to researching
> with
> > > visual methods (3 ed.). London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.; New Delhi;
> > > Singapore: Sage Publications Ltd.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 26 Nov 2013, at 1:06 am, Chris Rust <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In the present case the researcher was exploring the value of
> mockups in
> > > particular kinds of collaboration. He conducted some codesign workshops
> > > where he took the part of the designer/facilitator working with an
> expert
> > > surgeon to explore new designs of surgical simulators (anatomical
> models)
> > > through the use of mockups. Subsequently he convened a group of
> experienced
> > > designers to view the video material and recorded their reactions and
> > > observations to help identify key events and instances of "designerly"
> > > thinking by the participants. He has used the expert discussion (also
> on
> > > video) as another layer in his analysis of the original video, video
> > > squared like this is useful as the two have their event timings in
> sync.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
> > > Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Luke Feast | Lecturer | Early Career Development Fellow | PhD Candidate |
> > Faculty of Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne,
> Australia
> > | [log in to unmask] | Ph: +61 3 9214 6165 |
> > http://www.swinburne.edu.au/design/
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]>
> > Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
> > Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]>
> Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
> Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>


-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager