JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  October 2013

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING October 2013

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Post New Message

Post New Message

Newsletter Templates

Newsletter Templates

Log Out

Log Out

Change Password

Change Password

Subject:

Re: 'let me show you my vinyl record collection'

From:

bronac ferran <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

bronac ferran <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 26 Oct 2013 20:12:50 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (189 lines)

Reply

Reply

Thanks Johannes. Glad to have been amusing! When in Riga for the Media Art
History conference Giselle Beiguelman did say to me that she had also found
it an amusing comment and also, more seriously, she did also feel the
discussion on this list had been very US-Euro centric. I do hope she might
be reading this and in the midst of her very busy schedule perhaps comment.

I did find your mini-synthesis - below - very good to read. My own response
has veered from happiness to read about things which have not yet been
digested by historical processes of analysis and interpretation and some
concern that by biting into the offered apple those very undigested,
valuable, narratives might end up centralised and possessed in some
privately owned academic vault, having been lured in by responding to a
call for sharing and openness. This might seem cynical but I've been very
much reminded of a parallel development, in 1995-1996, when i started
working as Senior Live Art Officer at Arts Council England and one of the
projects I inherited from my predecessor was called the National Live Art
Archive initiative. It had involved a verbal agreement by ACE to hand over
its archive about live and performance art - including many valuable
documentary videos and ephemera built up over some decades and deposited
with ACE in the expectation that they might remain there - to one
university, which had promised to 'digitise' the  database thus showing
initiative and gain institutional leadership in a yet to be fully
academised field.  They would receive the material without payment but
would offer zealous enthusiasm (genuine) and commitment to building the
technical systems. They wiuld make the material to other researchers of
course;  they wished to simultaneously start to collect actual material
collections (live and performance art being then also at the fragmented,
boxes in various attics, not sure if its got value) or, if you like, vinyl
record stage.

The challenge for ACE was to prepare a policy framework and in the end a
legal agreeent which would protect this distributed collection from future
changes, ie becoming in any sense inaccessible to others - and most
importantly not surrendering responsibility of 'ownership' to the most fast
moving institution staking a claim to (in a sense) look after it. So legal
agreements were signed allowing ACE to take the archive back at any point -
but immediately it became clear that having, for eg, digitised the data
around it, the organisation digitising it, doing the input, now had rights
over it.  I am mentioning this by way of analogy: live art is even more
prone to time-detrimental-erasure than online lists are, much remains in
distributed social memory, there is no repeatable source code.  In the
event, we began a publishing initiative called The Vanishing History of
Peformance Art offering small grants to various distributed mico and
otherwise live art archives to avoid what I saw as a death-trap, of
monopoly by one institution. In the end, Nottingham Trent, which also ran
the Live Art List, passed on its repositories to another university, which
continues to conserve and use it today though the list has passed away.

With apologies for not being as brief here as usual, I guess my linking
thought is (and I am interested in other views) that it is magnificent that
Charlotte's action here has flushed out of the depths hidden tales at least
from some of the precursors and has been an extraordinary catalyst to make
this valuable information visible and presumably valuable to anyone
interested in doing scholarship around the works and initiatives exposed.
 It seems vital that the movement to centralise information doesn't negate
the distributed and divergent nature of the material and the narratives.
 Of course having now placed this material partially in the public domain
via publication in this list anyone can use it and that's welcome.  A
concentration in one (private?) university of follow up to this for eg by
collecting various list archives in an exclusive way makes me very nervous
based on previous experience, as above. This is a distributed and
collective art history.

My final observation: it was great being in Riga listening to many voices
which don't turn up on this list who were describing projects going on in
very specific localities and often these seemed wonderfully obscure for
this reason all the more interesting at least to me...

all the best

Bronac


On Saturday, 26 October 2013, Johannes Birringer wrote:

> dear all
>
> Bronac's observation/comment, quoted in the header, was funny wouldn't you
> agree?
> and yet after some pondering, I would say this month has been a
> riveting affair, if one observed the outpourings, and much much more than
> a Grateful Dead reunion tour.
> even though there was that, too.
>
> I appreciated learning much, also noting the care with which list members
> tried to remember and fill gaps or point to others, the was a real
> collective spirit amongst the showing of the personal collections.
>
> Then there were some reflective postings that I found tremendously
> thoughtful, for example Johannes Goebel's "what's art history got to do
> with it?"
> on October 10; and Tom Sherman's "Way Back in 1995!" on October 20; but
> also the critical feedback regarding differences between
> art critics, historians and theorists was very helpful - and here someone
> [Simon Biggs I think] evoked the problematic idea that new media
> artists/digital artist best write their [own] histories
> themselves or have in effect done so, well, in extension, also curated
> themselves - and then written/indexed their exhibition histories ......? –
> and undoubtedly there is or has to be a link to the academy, then, and to
> places where we teach or get invited to show our work, or where requests
> may come from
> regarding our work that someone is studying as if we were already
> gratefully dead etc , and then Simon Biggs added some provocative  comments
> on the conservativism of university
> art schools or art history departments or organizations (the CAA was
> mentioned a few times).
>
> Trying to look back at the "crowd-sourcing" idea behind Charlotte's "call
> for papers" this month, there are still some open questions to me (about
> Charlotte's TWO books/Arts Future Book project, which, as I had asked her,
> seemed already written-to-be-published after peer review  to be accompanied
> by a second book to be peer reviewed?  and so the Crumb discussion this
> month, how does it effectively become the second "book", while the very
> notion of book is questioned here directly using a list for
> research/writing.... ,  and what are these here collection-energies now
> manifesting, at this point?  Charlotte also mentions a list archivisation
> project as a third meta thing!  [a propos, a mentioning of Jon Ippolito and
> "Unreliable Archivist project"  - i think most archives are unreliable, and
> I love the scene in "Rollerball" where John Gielgud as keeper of the
> world's centralised computer memory bank in Switzerland has to confess that
> a slight mistake had happened and the 13th century got deleted).
>
> también I observed the net that was thrown by Charlotte was getting wider
> and wider and maybe
> this widening of practices, on and off line, and 'histories' (language
> stubbornly remainng english, strangely, and perimeter was USA-Europe
> largely,  I saw no posting from colleagues in Japan and S Korea for
> example, surprisingly, also very few or no reference to new media art
> history and online action in Brazil and Latin America) , is most likely
> uncontainable and unwritable.
>
> I propose this proposition (this month) cannot go anywhere except into
> countless fragmenting alleys and stories, re/collections and myths,
> incomplete just as other older "art history" ever was [whose art history?
>  whose "repressed exhibition histories," to cite Beryl's comment of Oct.
> 16], western, european? published in whose service?  Thanks to Sally Jane
> for mentioning some others, like the "non-cultural" world..]
>
> At one point Honor Harger says that a list (Syndicate) changed her life,
> which is an astonishing comment (and one that I could never make);  after
> noting that people have migrated to other lists or social media, Honor
> bemoans the
> discursive quality that's missing ("I think that's probably as much down
> to the way  that people's behaviour on mailing lists have changed, in the
> wake of social media" -  interesting, can you please say more about that?
> my behavior hasn't changed at all, I hope)
>
> Charlotte brings Renee McGarry's letter forward, and Renee bluntly says:
> "When I think about digital art history I'm left with a lot more questions
> than answers....".
>
> Yes, that is also the case for me.
>
> When Charlotte added questions ("what's art history got to do with it?")
> and then half way through the month again, more questions  ("Half-time
> discussion refresher"), I did think they were often of course to the point
> and well asked, such as the point about who is writing art criticism today
> (and where)["Anyone can take on the role of the critic in our digital age,
> with online art journals, blogs and other sites," Lori Waxman thinks) or
> who are the historians/forensicfactfinders (and, thanks Rob, why not more
> wheel sharers?).... but ultimately now I felt the month was overwhelmingly
> dislocating, we were turned to very many directions, and the debate about
> critics/bloggers not able to be critical of work created in their community
> is disheartening. Charlotte, had we seen your book we could have been more
> critical here.
>
> I also sensed a tremendous sense of melancholia.
>
> How do others feel about it?
>
> respectfully
> Johannes Birringer
> DAP-Lab
> http://www.brunel.ac.uk/dap
>
>
> [Goebel schreibt]
> >>
> What could be a positive consequence for us little people (the ones
> without power to port what we discovered) out of this? Liberation from
> creating our own monuments and making and living time-based arts which are
> only good for the moment when they are happening. (So now we are thinking
> performing email lists!)
> >>
>


-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager