JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MCG Archives


MCG Archives

MCG Archives


MCG@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MCG Home

MCG Home

MCG  October 2013

MCG October 2013

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Benefits of custom-built CMS vs adapting off-the-shelf - your experience?

From:

Adrian Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Museums Computer Group <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:56:28 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

Hi Nick



We went through this very issue at the Horniman a few years ago. 



Things affecting our decision (to use a semi-open-source, provided platform - ie. Keepthinking's which Cristiano describes below) were:



- Prior to my time here, we'd had a variety of sites built on Joomla / Drupal (I honestly can't quite remember which; maybe even both!). They were pretty disastrous (disclaimer: for a wide variety of reasons) - buggy, lots of holes, basically a pain in the head.



- I'd question your assumption about being tied to a supplier. At the Horniman, we'd previously flitted from supplier to supplier - generally not making much progress with any (read: failing) and it was all a bit unstable. I wanted stability and a partner with whom I could make a good, long-term partnership* - which would benefit us and we could build on. Finding the right supplier is key here, obviously. (We had prior acrimonious experience [disclaimer no 2: variety of reasons; not all down to those suppliers].)



- While in principle I agree with everyone's comments on open source, here (and in previous roles), I found that most suppliers said to customise open source was going to take as much budget, time, resource and effort as creating something more specific to us. So why not do that then?



It's largely about how flexible you want to be / can be with the content you intend to produce - does this need to be super-specifically made to your exact brief or can this be moulded into other formats? 	



Also - questions which influenced our thinking - is there on-going budget or one-off project funding to support further digital developments? Is there the in-house ability to manage technical developments? Do we have to integrate with any number of databases (we had 3 main tools to integrate with - potentially more).  



Plus there are a raft of other questions beyond the technical - how well does this partner do design, manage projects, prior experience (particularly at the Horniman with database integration.; this was a HUGE issue for us). 



Probably lots more now that I can't quite remember - but happy to discuss further with you if you wish! 



Thanks, Adrian







* beginning to sound like a Lonely Hearts column here. Apols. 



--

Adrian Murphy

Digital Media Manager

Horniman Museum and Gardens



Dir: 020 8291 8724

email: [log in to unmask]



-----Original Message-----

From: Museums Computer Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Cristiano Bianchi

Sent: 16 October 2013 12:57

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [MCG] Benefits of custom-built CMS vs adapting off-the-shelf - your experience?



Hi Nick,



very interesting question - as also pointed out by Mike.



I agree with Mike, but from a different angle - as I don't necessary believe that only open source (the free flavour) systems should be

considered: there are a lot of excellent industry standard, enterprise solutions that are not free (although in most cases they are still open source - in the sense that if you want you can access and edit the source

code) that exist for a very good reason: they get the job done and typically save you lots of time and money. Tiny disclaimer here: like Mike before me, I am biased - as we have a CMS platform - but it's not bespoke to any of our customers: they all use the same.



I personally don't buy the argument that your technology partner are

floating: that is that a bespoke solution is the best fit for you. How is it better? If you have do design and build a website, do you want to focus on design, functionalities and content - which is already quite a challenge to do in any project timeline - or do you want to start building the basic tools and embark into a software development project, which will require extra months in your project schedule and add massive elements of risk?



More, will the new and bespoke CMS possess all the features that are standard in the vast majority of CMSs, free and non-free, such as granular user permissions, audit trails, scheduling manager, media manager, multi-versioning and video transcoding? We have been building our commercial CMS platform for over 12 years and these things take time - and a lot of it.



Another question. What will the lifecycle of the new CMS be? Will it be used by your technology partner in other projects - so that will own its IPs and will be developing it in the future? Of you will be left with a platform that was build specifically for you, that no one else understand and that (unless you have an in-house very competent technical team with Ruby skills) you will have no exact understanding of? I would not count on the fact that Ruby is a well known technology and it'll be relatively easy to find other developers. The reality is (as Mike points out), that few others will want or be able to take on from where another developer has left - it is not impossible: when you work with Drupal or Wordpress (or our

own) you also work with other people's code - but it'll be a lot more difficult.



As to performance and flexibility, I don't agree with your technology partner. Most current CMS systems are powerful and flexible enough to let you do whatever you want with your content. The really important feature is that content is completely separated from presentation (and in that I'd also cast a doubt on Drupal) - we usually build two completely separate

layers: the CMS manages content and one (or more) web/mobile/anything else applications extract it and present it.



Bottom line for me: building a CMS is an independent software project. If building a website is your goal, I'd stay away from it. If you want to be even more radical, I would not choose a CMS until you have specified and designed at least part of the website - and then see what fits the bill: a modern CMS solution, based on a content delivery framework will be capable of adapting to (nearly) anything, with slight variations.



Good luck with your project!



Best, Cristiano



---



Cristiano Bianchi

Keepthinking



43 Clerkenwell Road

London EC1M 5RS

tel +44 20 7490 5337



[log in to unmask]

www.keepthinking.it









On 16 October 2013 11:54, Nick Sharp <[log in to unmask]> wrote:



> Hi MCGers,

>

> Firstly quickly wanted to introduce myself ­ I started at the 

> beginning of September as Head of Digital here at the Royal Academy. 

> Do get in touch to say hello!

>

> I'm working on a website redevelopment project here, and I wanted to 

> canvass opinion on our technology choice. Our technology partners are 

> suggesting building a bespoke CMS (primarily using Ruby and other open 

> source technologies), rather than adapting a CMS (like Drupal, for the 

> sake of argument).

>

> I've worked with both solutions in the past, but I wondered if any 

> MCGers had any thoughts based on their experience in this sector.

>

> My concern is that, when I've worked with a custom CMS before ­ for 

> example, GOV.UK ­ it's involved a large internal development team, 

> something we currently lack.  I don't want to tie us into a 

> relationship with one supplier (as with proprietary systems of old), 

> but at the same time, assuming the language and technology are 

> well-supported by the developer community, a custom CMS will offer us 

> a lighter, more elegant solution.

>

> Does anyone have any experience of making similar choices, or how it 

> has worked out for them?  Realise this is quite a broad question and 

> brings up loads of associated questions, both philosophical and 

> practical. But would be interested in your thoughts.

>

> Couple of thoughts below:

>

> Benefits of a custom CMS

>

> * we can build exactly the right CMS for the RA, we don't have to bend 

> an off the shelf product into shape

> * it will be faster, the database structure is optimised for the RA, 

> an off the shelf CMS database is designed for flexibility

> * we can design a more dynamic system, unconstrained by the particular 

> usage model an off the shelf CMS would bring

>

> Drawbacks of a custom CMS

>

> * extending the system will require more in depth knowledge, currently 

> not existing in-house

> * Could tie the RA into a difficult/expensive issue if technology 

> moves in a different direction

>

> Benefits of an off the shelf CMS

>

> * a community of developers exist that understand how to use it

> * can be extended easily to add functionality

> * includes robust code for handling classic content management tasks

> * powerful

>

> Drawbacks of an off the shelf CMS

>

> * upgrades to an of the shelf CMS could have unforeseen consequences 

> for the system

> * an off the shelf CMS represents a retrospective view of the trend in 

> content management. In contrast we are trying to build a future facing 

> approach for the RA.

> * might cost money to buy a licence on a recurring basis

> * the CMS design might go out of date, or be superseded by better designs.

> * complex, lots of features are included which are not needed by the 

> RA

> * Could prove expensive to build and customise for RA requirements

>

>

> Thanks!

>

> Nick Sharp @emuroad

>

> Head of Digital

>

> Royal Academy of Arts

> Burlington House

> Piccadilly

> London  W1J 0BD

>

> 020 7300 5803 | 07718 236871

>

> www.royalacademy.org.uk <http://www.royalacademy.org.uk/>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> The Royal Academy of Arts is a registered charity under Registered 

> Charity Number 1125383 and is also registered as a company limited by 

> guarantee in England and Wales under Company Number 6298947. Registered office:

> Burlington House, Piccadilly, London, W1J 0BD.

>

>

>

> The Royal Academy of Arts is a registered charity under Registered 

> Charity Number 1125383 and is also registered as a company limited by 

> guarantee in England and Wales under Company Number 6298947. Registered office:

> Burlington House, Piccadilly, London, W1J 0BD.

>

> ****************************************************************

>        website:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/

>        Twitter:  http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg

>       Facebook:  http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup

>  [un]subscribe:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/

> ****************************************************************

>







-- 



Cristiano Bianchi

*Keepthinking*



43 Clerkenwell Road

London EC1M 5RS

tel +44 20 7490 5337

mobile +44 7939 041169 (UK)



[log in to unmask]

www.keepthinking.it



---



Registration no. 04905582

VAT 831 1329 62



****************************************************************

       website:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/

       Twitter:  http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg

      Facebook:  http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup

 [un]subscribe:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/

****************************************************************

* Joint winner of the Kids in Museums / Telegraph Family Friendly Museum Award 2013



* Join us for a fun family trip in our Amazon Adventure exhibition! Book now at www.horniman.ac.uk/amazon



* Visit our website to see exhibitions, events, explore our collections and much more: http://www.horniman.ac.uk





The Horniman Public Museum & Public Park Trust. 100 London Road, London SE23 3PQ.

Registered as a charity in England and Wales. Charity registration number: 802725 

Company registration number: 2456393





Disclaimer

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and is intended for the use of the addressee only. It may contain personal views which are not the views of the Horniman Museum, unless specifically stated. If you  have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the Horniman may monitor e-mails sent or received. It is the recipient’s responsibility to ensure that appropriate measures are in place to check for software viruses.







****************************************************************

       website:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/

       Twitter:  http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg

      Facebook:  http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup

 [un]subscribe:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/

****************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager