Should the IPv6 testing also feature here?
Pete
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Gronbech GridPP Project Manager Tel No. : 01865 273389
Fax No. : 01865 273418
Department of Particle Physics,
University of Oxford,
Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK E-mail : [log in to unmask]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wahid Bhimji
> Sent: 13 September 2013 13:37
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Technical Meetings
>
> I meant manycore - but actually multicore also should be on there (and is
> more likely / certain to actually be relevant).
>
> wahid
>
> On 13 Sep 2013, at 13:18, Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > With manycore do you mean multicore?
> >
> > For multicore I see a lot of positive reason to put more work into it. The use
> of less memory has snowball effects not only on the amount of hardware we
> might buy but also on the possibility of using 64bit on more applications and
> 64bit applications are more efficient ie. higher HS06 values. Of course there is
> the problem of how to schedule the jobs but until there are more queues
> this will have little priority. Also I know experiments are at different stages
> for this.
> >
> > cheers
> > alessandra
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 13/09/2013 13:09, Wahid Bhimji wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >>> Is there any other technical activity that should be brought in to these
> meetings? This would include any technical activity that people would want in
> GridPP5.
> >> Manycore and supercomputing ? (Andy won't be there so maybe
> covering in this meeting is not possible - but it is part of the technical
> landscape) .
> >>
> >> Generally 2 / 3 topics being cloud is probably too much focus on clouds.
> >>
> >> Wahid
> >>
> >> On 13 Sep 2013, at 10:51, David Colling <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Andrew et al,
> >>>
> >>> I have had a few private emails not to the list agreeing with this approach
> and if Andrew would find it difficult to make the meeting as well I think that
> clinches it.
> >>>
> >>> So could people prepare some summaries for next week about the
> different areas of technical activity - this could usefully be a few slides or
> even a text document with a few bullet points just to provide a record.
> >>>
> >>> Off the top of my head (and not very reliably as I am in a project review):
> the areas where I would expect a summary are:
> >>>
> >>> - The activity of the storage group (brief because this is large)
> >>> - The state of the GridPP test cloud
> >>> - Cloud activity from each of the experiments
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Is there any other technical activity that should be brought in to these
> meetings? This would include any technical activity that people would want in
> GridPP5.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> david
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 13/09/13 10:15, Andrew McNab wrote:
> >>>> On 13 Sep 2013, at 07:27, David Colling <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >>>>> We are due to re-start our technical meetings today. I am not
> available because of an EU review, so this would normally mean that Andrew
> would chair the meeting. However, as it is the restart meeting I wondered if
> it made sense to have a slightly larger activity recap meeting next week
> instead. This would be a precursor to the technical discussion in the GridPP
> meeting the following week as these discussions will be all about the future.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What do others think about this?
> >>>> I think this would be a very good idea and I'm not sure I could have
> made it this afternoon due to other committments.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers
> >>>>
> >>>> Andrew
> >>>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Facts aren't facts if they come from the wrong people. (Paul Krugman)
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
|