On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:51:57AM +0100, Peter Keller wrote:
> The STAR grammar in chapter 2.1 is the accurate one. If you look at page
> 18, you will see that the productions for quoted text strings are
> completely different from the ones in chapter 2.2.
Different, but look equivalent to me.
But clearly there are differences between STAR and CIF grammars.
I'm not interested enough in these format to continue this thread
much longer. When I was writing CIF parser 5 years ago I also had
impression that there are mistakes in the CIF spec. If that's true,
IMO listing (and then fixing) these mistakes can prevent different
CIF dialects. Recommending STAR spec as extra reading can't.
Regards
Marcin
--
Scanned by iCritical.
|