JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ARCHIVES-NRA Archives


ARCHIVES-NRA Archives

ARCHIVES-NRA Archives


ARCHIVES-NRA@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARCHIVES-NRA Home

ARCHIVES-NRA Home

ARCHIVES-NRA  August 2013

ARCHIVES-NRA August 2013

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Vacancy for Archives and Records Management Intern, Solutions

From:

Pamela Birch <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Pamela Birch <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 15 Aug 2013 08:04:52 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (204 lines)

Bedford BC Not Protectively Marked.


Thanks Joseph, you summed up my feelings on this nicely. 

 

Having spent this year looking at the history of Bedfordshire Record
Office I would also point out that it was an 'independently wealthy,
well intentioned, do-gooder' who managed to kick start the profession of
archivist (in local government terms at least) 100 years ago by founding
a county record office and providing on the job training, something he
continued to do until his death in 1940.

 

Pamela Birch 
Conservator/Premises & Projects Officer 

Bedfordshire & Luton Archives & Records Service
800 years of history, 100 years of service. Centenary 2013. Help us
celebrate www.bedford.gov.uk/archivecentenary
<http://www.bedford.gov.uk/archivecentenary> 

Open: Mon 9am-7pm, Tues, Wed & Fri 9am-5pm. Closed Thursday. 
Tel: 01234 228908 (direct line) 01234 228833 (main office)
www.bedfordshire.gov.uk/archive Twitter @BedsArchives

 

________________________________

From: Archivists, conservators and records managers.
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Joseph Bartoletti
Sent: 14 August 2013 18:09
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Vacancy for Archives and Records Management Intern,
Solutions

 


I feel compelled to offer another side to this debate. Since this
argument is continually used again and again, can someone tell me what
profession enforces a quota on University placements? I'm going to have
to say none. At the end of the day Universities are in the business of
teaching and academia, nothing more. While they may have some indirect
concern with the number of graduates employed six months after
graduation (looks good in stats) they are not there to rig the job
market. If they have turned out more quality candidates than the market
can accept, well bad for some of the graduates but good for the
profession. 

Also, 'independently wealthy, well intentioned, do-gooders' are not a
new incarnation due to the current economic climate. They were in fact
the cornerstones for much of the museum profession. 
  
Some direct points to Craig's 'simple solutions'. 
  
1.        Decide on a set number of students to be admitted to the
archive schools each year. Any archives school that admits more than
their quota should lose their accreditation. 
        Again, this has been stated over and over in the past. State
exactly how this should be done accurately. Continually monitor the job
market for anyone retiring or changing professions? Adequately gauging
this year after year is not pragmatic. Again, the job of the
Universities is to turn out qualified suitable candidates. Every degree
/ profession have people who for whatever reason go into another field
and there are more people who work in fields different to their degrees
than those that do. I spent eight months unemployed shortly after
finishing my course and never once did I blame the number of graduates.
I had many near misses and always lost out to experience. Certainly not
the Uni's fault. 
2.        Legally define and protect the term 'archivist'. Define the
term to mean someone  who has a recognised qualification from one of the
archive schools. 
        Not possible and nor should it be. Even if it was, then what?
Maybe instead of the term 'archivist' organizations will just use titles
like 'Keepers of Old Info and Stuff'. Plus what about all those
professionals who do not have a degree and have done WAY more for the
profession than most with the piece of paper? I guess there's no room
anymore for anyone rising up through the ranks of the profession without
a degree. 
3.        Legally require all organisations subject to Section 46 -
Freedom of Information Act to employ an archivist. 
        You're leaving out people who have specifically done records
management degrees. 
4.        The ICO should produce guidelines strongly advising the
retention of a qualified archivist in the role of an organisations
designated Data Protection Officer. 
        Why? What does the qualification of archivist bring to this
role? I am a qualified archivist (so my piece of paper tells me) and
have a BCS Cert in DPA. I do not agree that having the former was a huge
factor in earning the latter. If any argument can be made it is that the
role should be taken on by someone with a degree in law not archives
management. 

        Maybe people should stop blaming the Universities and move on to
something more productive? Society has gone information mad, and so
there should be no shortage of opportunities. We need to better fight
the information profession's corner and prove its worth. 

        A good example is when a coursemate applied for a job at a
school. The job advert screamed 'Archivist', but the title was far from
that. Not one of the candidates who landed an interview had any
experience or qualification in archives. I'm sure many more have stories
similar, and while I know I don't have the answers, I do know that
'excessive' amounts of graduates is not the problem. 

        It should go without saying that the views express are entirely
my own and not my employer's. 


Sincerely,

Joseph Bartoletti
Corporate Records Management Officer

Legal and Democratic Services

________________________________

Any opinions or statements expressed in this e-mail are those of the
individual and not necessarily those of Middlesbrough Council. Internet
communications are not secure and therefore Middlesbrough Council does
not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message as it
has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect the message
may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may be
legally privileged, and are solely for the use of the intended
recipient. If you receive this in error, please do not disclose any
information to anyone and notify the sender at the above address. Any
disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted, in
reliance on the contents, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

Middlesbrough Council's computer systems and communications may be
monitored to ensure effective operation of the system and for other
lawful purposes.

Save energy, money and the environment - is it really necessary to print
this message?

** This email has been scanned for viruses, vandals and malicious
content. ** 

________________________________

Contact the list owner for assistance at
[log in to unmask] 

For information about joining, leaving and suspending mail (eg during a
holiday) see the list website at
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=archives-nra


Information security classification* of this email: 

 

UNCLASSIFIED: No breaches of Data Protection Act or Statutory
Obligations.

PROTECT: Information that could cause harm to individual or group and
breaches Data Protection Act and breaches statutory obligations 

RESTRICTED: Information of high significance (causes significant harm)
to individuals, groups and business; breaches Data Protection Act and
Statutory obligation 

 

Bedford Borough Council:-This email contains information intended for
the addressee only and may be confidential, the subject of legal or
professional privilege, or be otherwise protected from disclosure. This
transmission is intended for the named addressee(s) only and may contain
sensitive or protectively marked material up to RESTRICTED and should be
handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised
to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose
it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error
please notify the sender immediately. 

 

All GCSx traffic? may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in
accordance with relevant legislation. This email and any attached file
are the property of Bedford Borough Council. Any opinions expressed in
this mail do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Bedford Borough
Council. 

? Bedford Borough Council is continuously working towards the
requirements of the Government Secure Intranet (GSi) 

Please delete if you are not the intended recipient

 

“Confidentiality:  The information contained in this e-mail and any attachment may be confidential and may contain legally privileged information.  It is intended only for the use of the named recipient.  If you are not the named recipient, please notify us immediately and delete it from your system.  In such an event, you should not disclose the contents of this e-mail to any other person, or print it.”

Contact the list owner for assistance at [log in to unmask]

For information about joining, leaving and suspending mail (eg during a holiday) see the list website at
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=archives-nra

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager