So, your first level model has some ev/cope that captures the signal
change induced by some task manipulation? If so, then yes, you can merge
the copes modeling that across subjects. These copes are the signal
change relative to an implicit baseline. And then you can indeed use
'randomise' to test if that signal change was non-zero. (But none of that
really has anything to do with "resting state").
cheers,
-MH
--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO 63110 Email: [log in to unmask]
On 8/19/13 4:18 PM, "Fadel zeidan" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Hello again,
>
>I apologize for the confusion.
>
>I was under the impression that those two aspects were the same. I would
>like to assess significant activation of a specific cognitive condition
>without contrasting this condition to another. Of course, I want this
>activation to be statistically greater than 0.
>
>Does that clear it up?
________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
|