Dear Niu,
I first would look at the data set statistics of the data set before
investigating individual reflections, and also take a look at FRAME.cbf which
shows the predicted spots for the last integrated image.
Best,
Tim
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 04:34:11PM -0400, Niu Tou wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> When I processed one data set with XDS, the index step said there is no
> sufficient (<50%) spots indexed, however after I tried various parameters
> to get the same cell unit and space group, I chose to ignore this message
> and wen on to integration.
>
> During the integration I had to modify the following keywords to finish as
> instructed by the manual:
> REFLECTING_RANGE REFLECTING_RANGE_E.S.D.
> BEAM_DIVERGENCE= BEAM_DIVERGENCE_E.S.D.
>
> Finally I got a scaled file, but there are many negative numbers in the
> column 4 IOBS, and the SIGMA seems very high, for example:
> 0 0 -6 1.751E+03 9.025E+02 1547.9 1935.5 55.0 0.32158
> 95 33 -85.79
> 0 0 -6 -1.795E+00 5.171E+02 1547.9 1117.2 22.7 0.32158
> 100 -2 93.56
> 0 0 6 1.426E+03 7.902E+02 1550.9 1117.2 58.7 0.32158
> 100 38 85.86
> 0 0 6 8.512E+02 5.216E+02 1550.9 1935.5 19.0 0.32158
> 95 23 -93.63
> 0 0 -7 -4.436E+01 4.495E+02 1547.5 2011.5 54.7 0.37469
> 100 -11 -85.79
>
> Does this mean the process is wrong? Anything I can do in this case?
>
> Best,
> Niu
--
--
Dr Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen
GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A
|