FWIW, I've been running CREAM CE 1.14.4 on SL5 since April and haven't
noticed any extra problems compared to earlier versions. This is not to
say that I don't agree with the sentiment in your comments.
John
On 23/07/2013 09:58, Stephen Jones wrote:
> On 07/22/2013 04:25 PM, Matt Doidge wrote:
>> SHA-2 hitting the fan...
>> As mentioned by Kashif, a number of sites have been handed out tickets
>> after failing SHA-2 tests. Liverpool, Lancaster, RALPP, Bristol, ECDF
>> and Durham have all received tickets for one or two of their CREAM
>> CEs, IC received one for their WMS (which Daniela has already
>> expressed her righteous displeasure about). Most are In Progress already.
>>
>
> Hi all,
>
> This seems wasteful. We are in the midst of migration from the CEs that
> have been ticketed (SL5/EMI2) to a new set-up using SL6/EMI3. So why do
> we test and ticket the obsolete systems? They are only used for parallel
> running until the experiments migrate to EMI3/SL6, then they will be
> wound down. I guess I'd do it, but I have an honest question - is there
> a way to head off this by using some foresight in the central planning?
> Oh, to heck with it - maybe I'll just fling the new version on and see
> if it survives!
>
> Steve
>
|