JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH  July 2013

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH July 2013

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: case load size

From:

Deborah Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health research." <[log in to unmask]>, Deborah Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:51:06 +1000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (107 lines)

Hi there, I am interested in your experiences of case-loading models of midwifery with a mixed risk group of women (as in social and health risks), in particular the size of the case-load.  It seems usual in Australia for employed case-loading midwives to take a case load of about 40 low risk women and I am looking for some information that might offer us some guidance in establishing the case-load for emplyed midwives caring for a mixed risk group? Do you have any advice or publications that you know of that might be useful?
regards
Deb


Deborah Davis
Adjunct Professor of Midwifery
University of Technology, Sydney

Professor of Midwifery
University of Canberra
Bruce, 2601
ACT. Australia




________________________________________
From: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health research. [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Andrew Symon [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, 10 July 2013 7:45 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: validated instruments for measuring mental health in pregnant women?

Dear Hanne,
Your request came last week while I was away.
I wonder if you have considered using a quality of life tool along with the other instruments.
The Mother-Generated Index has been validated for postnatal use (Symon et al 2003), and has been used during pregnancy too (other references below). Its value is that it provides insights into what the woman really thinks, so can provide a lot more useful information than that collected using standard tools. It’s complementary in that sense.

The MGI form does need some explanation, because it’s not the usual ‘tick-box’ approach used by so many survey forms. It also requires a certain level of articulacy, but in practice we’ve found that once women see the point of it they’re quite comfortable with expressing their thoughts in this way.
It’s been used in several countries now (see JAN 2012 article cited below).

I’m happy to discuss if you want to contact me.
Kind regards,
Andrew Symon

Dr Andrew Symon
Senior Lecturer
School of Nursing & Midwifery
University of Dundee
Dundee DD1 4HJ
Scotland
Tel: +44 (0)1382 388553

Masters in Research:
http://www.dundee.ac.uk/nursingmidwifery/pq/pg/mres/
Linked In:
http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=66028160&trk=tab_pro


Selected references

Symon A, Nagpal J, Maniecka-Bryùa I, Nowakowska-Gùàb A, Rashidian A, Khabiri R, Mendes I, Bezerra Pinheiro AK, Fontenele de Oliveira M, Wu L. (2013) Cross-cultural adaptation and translation of a quality of life tool for new mothers: a methodological and experiential account from six countries. Journal of Advanced Nursing, doi.10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06098.x.

Symon A (2012) The Mother-Generated Index: a new approach to assessing maternal quality of life. In: Perinatal Mental Health: A Clinical Guide (Martin C, ed). M&K Update Ltd., Keswick, pp 325-334

Symon A, Dobb B (2008) An Exploratory Study to Assess the Acceptability of an Antenatal Quality of Life Instrument (The Mother-Generated Index). Midwifery, 24: 442-450

Symon A, McGreavey J, Picken C (2003) Validation of the Mother-Generated Index. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 110: 865-868

Symon A, MacDonald A, Ruta D (2002) Postnatal Quality of Life Assessment: introducing the Mother-Generated Index. Birth, 29: 40-46


-----Original Message-----
From: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health research. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Hanne Kj¿rgaard
Sent: 03 July 2013 15:36
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: validated instruments for measuring mental health in pregnant women?
Importance: Low

Fra: Hanne Kj¿rgaard
Sendt: 3. juli 2013 16:18
Til: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health               research.; [log in to unmask]
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Emne: validated instruments for measuring mental health in pregnant women?

Dear all
Does anyone know about validated instruments for measuring mental health in pregnant women and instruments for measuring psychosocial distress and other social issues (incl SES)?
Thank you !
Best regards,
Hanne

Hanne Kj¿rgaard, RM, Ph.D
Head of research, The Research Unit Women's and Children's Health Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark Associate professor Faculty of Helath and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Denmark




________________________________


Denne e-mail indeholder fortrolig information. Hvis du ikke er den rette modtager af denne e-mail eller hvis du modtager den ved en fejltagelse, beder vi dig venligst informere afsender om fejlen ved at bruge svarfunktionen. Samtidig bedes du slette e-mailen med det samme uden at videresende eller kopiere den.


The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096

UTS CRICOS Provider Code: 00099F
DISCLAIMER: This email message and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential information.
If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message or
attachments. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
this message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the
sender expressly, and with authority, states them to be the views of the University of Technology Sydney.
Before opening any attachments, please check them for viruses and defects.

Think. Green. Do.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager