-----Original Message-----
From: On Behalf Of Anne-Laure Amilhat-Szary

Call for papers Belgeo 2014/2

Cultural flagship projects in restructuring industrial areas : 
from urban renewal to metropolitan strategies ?

Guest editors : Thomas Pfirsch, CALHISTE, Université de Valenciennes &
Bernard Reitel, DYRT, Université d’Artois 
"Cities and Metropolisation" Commission of the CNFG

In a context of increasing global competition between cities, culture has
become in recent years an essential component of urban policies (Evans, 2001
; Swyngedouw and aliter 2002). Culture is seen as an indispensable
instrument for the cities post-modern transition to innovation-oriented
activities in the context of the knowledge-economy. Since the pioneering
initiatives from Baltimore or Bilbao, museums and large cultural facilities
such as libraries or major event complexes are playing a significant role in
the assertion of cities on the global scene. These “flagship projects” often
entrusted to top names of the global “starchitecture” (Jenks, 2005, Gravari,
2009) are used as emblems for broader projects of urban regeneration.
Ambitions go far beyond the mere development of  new cultural or touristic
services: the aim is not only to renew the image of the city, but also to
rethink centralities, to reshape public spaces and to define new relations
between the city and its region. Since the “Bilbao effect”, building major
cultural facilities has become a global urban paradigm which has been
largely mobilized by industrial cities in search of a new destiny (Ingallina
et Park, 2005): the Imperial War Museum in Manchester, the Design museum in
Essen in the Ruhr conurbation, the centre Pompidou in Metz and more recently
the Louvre in Lens.

 

More than 15 years after the Bilbao experience, we suggest to analyze the
uses and the urban effects of these major cultural facilities in
restructuring industrial areas. Indeed, beyond showcase effects and
marketing strategies, their actual impacts  remain poorly known and
difficult to evaluate (Evans, 2005; Orueta, 2009, Lusso). If the immediate
economic effects of major cultural facilities have sometimes been explored,
few studies have analysed their urban consequences. This is a crucial point,
especially in restructuring industrial areas. In such regions, shaped by
mining conurbations or polycentric urbanization corridors considered as
badly integrated by planners, large cultural projects are used to sew up the
built-up fabric, create new polarities and, in a word, produce urbanity.
Like the cities of the Ruhr’s conurbation, which, several years after the
end of the international architecture and urban planning exhibition IBA
(Internationale Bauaustellung), have collectively candidate to the label of
European cultural capital 2010 to assert a “Metropole Ruhr” on the
international stage, these projects embody the ambition to build
metropolises. Do major cultural projects really help bring structure and
urbanity to industrial areas ? Are they really a driving force for
metropolization processes?

 

Besides this urban focus, we also suggest to develop a reflective and
critical approach. Beyond official discourses and territorial marketing,
recent studies have stressed the growing manipulation of culture by
neo-liberal urban policies, whose one of the most impressive manifestation
would be represented by flagship projects (Swyngedouw, Moulaert et
Rodriguez, 2002 ; Rousseau, 2009 ; Smyth H., 1994). Major cultural
facilities are part of a strategy of “producing a valuable resource”
(Fagnoni, 2009), and often generate land and property valuations, which can
lead to processes of gentrification or social filtering. In old industrial
cities which have long been associated to a strong working class image and
spatial Keynesianism policies, , they can be used to reshape identities in
order to attract new middle or creative classes (Rousseau, 2009). Thus,
large cultural projects often introduce new elites in the game of urban
power and imply a growing role of local and regional public stakeholders as
well as an increasing recourse to public/private partnerships within a
context of growing merchandization of culture and museum institutions.

 

This urban and critical approach will focus on 3 over-lapping key areas.

 

 

Theme 1: Major cultural facilities as tools for regional planning and local
development

 

Papers will first explore the new governance models associated with economic
oriented cultural policies. Which players are involved in major cultural
developments? Faced with the withdrawal of central governments, the rise of
local powers and the increasing role of private entities, the question will
be asked whether museums and other cultural facilities can still play a role
in regional planning and reduce territorial inequalities?

Papers will also analyze the economic impact of major cultural facilities in
industrial areas. How do these large projects fit into their local economic
environment? Do they remain mere transplants with no effect on other
economic sectors or can they create a dynamic of development and economic
restructuring for a whole region? 

Third, methodological approaches will be discussed. Many works have analyzed
the direct economic impacts of museums, mostly in the tourism and culture
sectors, and using quantitative methods and data (number of tickets, of new
jobs, occupancy rates of the surrounding hotels and restaurants…). But
exploring the relationships between cultural facilities and their economic
environment requires broader and cross-sector approaches, both quantitative
and qualitative, in order to catch the effects of flagship projects on the
image of the cities and their interactions with the local economic system as
a whole, including traditional and new industries.

 

 

Theme 2. Major cultural facilities and the remaking of the city in
manufacturing areas

 

Museums and other major cultural developments do not have solely economic
objectives, they also form part of large urban regeneration programs. 

First, papers will analyze the effects of cultural facilities on the city
image and identity, focusing on the concept of “project” which of late has
had an increasing importance in urban planning. Can “cultural projects” be
used as a basis for strengthening broader “city projects” in old
manufacturing areas, that is to say can the development of collective
projects be designed to create a new local identity and international image?

The consequences of cultural facilities on urban centralities and public
spaces will also be explored. Indeed, large cultural developments are often
symbolic emblems for the building of new central areas in industrial
conurbations where public spaces are scarce or absent. How do cultural
facilities fit in with their surrounding area, both in terms of aesthetics,
morphology and functions? Are they well connected to the rest of the city,
and do they reshape the residents’ urban practices and their movements in
the urban environment?

Another key issue is the impact of cultural flagship projects on the social
geography of manufacturing cities. Indeed, cultural facilities can create
new public spaces, but they can also generate new forms of social
segregation and processes of land and property valorization. Are they
associated to gentrification or other social filtering processes? As some
recent studies have pointed out, can cultural projects be seen as parts of
symbolic policies designed to redefine working class cities for the new
middle class and creative groups?

 

Theme 3. Major cultural facilities as driving forces for metropolization?

 

Major cultural developments are often part of metropolization projects
aiming at enlarging urban organization and governance on a wider national,
international and cross-border scale. This is the case of the recent Emsher
valley cultural project, which involves all the cities of the Ruhr
conurbation. In the old manufacturing areas, where urbanization is often
extensive and polycentric, can major cultural facilities help form
integrated urban regions that may have more influence in the increasingly
competitive global context? 

Papers will explore the new sets of relationships that cultural developments
generate between cities of the same local manufacturing area, and between
industrial urban regions and large tertiary metropolitan areas on a national
or international scale. The positioning of flagship projects in the regional
or national cultural market will be discussed, as well as the new regional
cooperation policies that cultural projects invariably generate. 

 

Proposals, with a short presentation (less than one page), has to be
submitted to both guest editors ([log in to unmask] et
[log in to unmask]), with a copy to the co-director of Belgeo, Christian
Vandermotten ([log in to unmask]).

 

The deadline for the proposals is end of October 2013 and final papers,
ready for submission to the referees, are awaited before the end of April
2014 at the latest.

 

-- 


Anne-Laure AMILHAT SZARY


Professeure
Institut de Géographie Alpine, Université Joseph Fourier 
CNRS : Laboratoire PACTE-Territoires, UMR 5194
Membre de l’Institut Universitaire de France 



Page perso : http://www.pacte-grenoble.fr/blog/amilhat-szary-anne-laure/


14 bis ave. Marie Reynoard 
38100 Grenoble, France 
tél   : (33) 04 76 82 20 80 
fax : (33) 04 76 82 20 01