I'm sorry to admit that in almost every respect, this summary now looks
irrefutable.
For a moment it had looked as though there might be a chance of examining
some of the ways in which reading can be both "subjective and objective",
but I fear that moment has long passed.
I'm happy to spare myself and others the "masochism" of trudging on.
Basta!
Jamie
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Riley
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:47 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: "Multiple Registers, Intertextuality and Boundaries of
Interpretation in Veronica Forrest-Thompson"
Before it became a completely futile discussion about whether reading
is subjective or objective (it is of course both) this thread was
about Veronica Forrest Thompson, and somebody's statement that she was
"a conservative poet". To me this is meaningless and not discussable,
so I don't think there is any point in either going back or going on,
and staying where we are would be masochistic.
PR
|