Resent with the correct header............
> It can be attempted by imputing the 2x2 table using the methodology
> given by Carlo Di Pietrantonj in Statist. Med. 2006; 25:2299–2322.
> Then computing the RR for outcome Y instead of outcome not-Y from data
> in the table. But bear in mind that if they differ substantially then
> which is "correct" is a matter of judgement. For example, if mortality
> changes from 4% to 2% then mortality decreases by 50% (RR 0.5).
> However survival increases by 2% (RR 1.02). Obviously the RR for
> survival is more "correct" in this situation
>
> Suhail
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 12:05:41 +0100
> From: Sinead O Neill <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: How to convert the relative risk in the opposite direction
>
> I have the adjusted relative risk of NOT HAVING a subsequent pregnancy
> (eg. RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.87, 1.15).
> However, what I am interested in is the risk of HAVING a subsequent
> pregnancy......
> How do I calculate this from the estimate I have been given??
> Thank you
>
>
You may leave the list at any time by sending the command
SIGNOFF allstat
to [log in to unmask], leaving the subject line blank.
|