> less weighed down by an auratic understanding of objects
I'm not even weighed down by knowning what auratic means!
> we are looking specifically for physical reproductions
You may have seen these already on the BGS 3D blog, if not:
<<http://gb3dtypefossils.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/these-fossils-are-not-real.html>>
Cheers
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Museums Computer Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Sarah Younan
Sent: 01 May 2013 10:14
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Knowledge Exchange - How widespread are RP objects in UK collections?
Thank you for this
I agree, very cool! I find science and natural history collections are leading the way when it comes to methodologies for the digitization of objects and specimen. Perhaps they are less weighed down by an auratic understanding of objects?
However we are looking specifically for physical reproductions; objects that have been printed on 3D printers from digital files.
Sorry if my initial message was not one hundred percent clear on this.
Many thanks. Sarah
****************************************************************
website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
[un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
****************************************************************
****************************************************************
website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
[un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
****************************************************************
|