As I said to Liz, it is a perfectly valid to suggest dropping the word
"Library" - but the actual suggestions were still ludicrous.
Also, are you that enthusiastic about belonging to "CILIP"?
John Briggs
On 24/05/2013 20:18, David McMenemy wrote:
> I’ve just done the survey. I’m absolutely incredulous that the K word
> is in one of their suggestions and the L word isn’t.
>
> Says it all.
>
> None of the suggestions would be an organisation I’d be particularly
> enthusiastic to be part of.
>
> *From:*Library and Information Professionals
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *Liz Chapman
> *Sent:* 24 May 2013 20:12
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: CILIP Re-Branding
>
> I went through every question suggesting that they should add in the
> word 'library'. Not actually giving the OPTION of having a name/slogan
> etc with the word library in seems odd at best.
>
> Liz
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 6:44 PM, John Briggs <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> Does anyone else have a bad feeling about the CILIP re-branding
> exercise? The names they are consulting on are ludicrous.
> --
> John Briggs
>
|