JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for WEBPA Archives


WEBPA Archives

WEBPA Archives


WEBPA@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

WEBPA Home

WEBPA Home

WEBPA  April 2013

WEBPA April 2013

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

feed text comments email with WEBPA

From:

"Turner, James" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

WebPA <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:58:02 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

Hi

Like Linsey, we are testing out WEBPA at the moment with a view to roll it out next semester as a standalone system (not connected to a VLE). The replies have been most useful



I do have additional questions

1. How do people us the free text comments. They don't currently appear to the students as feedback within WEBPA. So have people tried  revealing that information to students or are they using it to moderate the marks and identify discrepancies in the way students are reporting the way they are working as a group. I can imagine it might be useful in terms of verifying that all students agreed that one member didn’t attend any meetings.



2. We are using LDAP to control student and staff access to WEBPA. I am trying to verify if student and staff accounts when using WEBPA in this way will need to have email data stored in WEBPA. I realise this will limit the ability to email out from WEBPA, but other than that will it serve any other purpose for us.



Cheers

Jim







-----Original Message-----

From: WebPA [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lynette Johns-Boast

Sent: 25 April 2013 09:17

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: Using WebPA in degree classification modules



Hi Linsey



For the past six years I have been using peer assessment (the last three years using a branched version of WebPA) to generate 75% of marks for an industry-based capstone software engineering design course where 3rd and 4th year students are required to work for two semesters in small teams of 5-7 students developing a software solution to a real-world problem for their client. At four points during the course team progress is assessed using gateway reviews which involve the team, the client, the team mentor and course academics. Peer assessment is used to calculate a moderator which is used to generate individual marks from the team mark.

Students like using peer assessment in this way as it empowers them. It enables students who want to work hard and get a good mark while not rewarding those students who have less drive and seems to overcome many (if not all) of the problems associated with social loafing and free-riding.



The assessment scheme makes it clear, and we are at pains to explain to students how we use peer assessment. We are also explicit that we reserve the right to amend the marks generated by peer assessment if we feel they are not a true reflection of contribution and that the marks they receive therefore may not be exactly as generated by WebPA. We have rarely had to intervene and amend the peer assessed marks. We do, however, exclude self-assessment when calculating the peer assessed rating as otherwise students can affect their own results in a way that is not necessarily reflective of contribution. We collect written feedback as well as the numeric ratings (using a Likert scale of 1-5).

The written feedback provides valuable insight into team contribution and validates the numeric ratings. The peer assessment data we collect usually validates the performance we see in the gateway review process and what mentors observe while supporting teams.  Like Neil we use SVN repositories and collaborative sites so the academics involved have access to all artefacts and team communication which enables us to verify claims if necessary.



Since the introduction of peer assessment, the complaints about marks have dropped to almost zero. After all who better to know what is going on in a team than the members of the team itself. Now with minimal effort by the academics we can award defensible individual marks for group work. The peer assessment data collected can also be used to mentor students to improve their performance - we have some great evidence of this working extremely well.



The course forms part of a 4-year accredited software engineering degree and our accrediting body have been very accepting of the benefits the students draw through the use of peer assessment to generate individual marks from group artefacts.



Cheers

Lynette





On 25/04/2013 01:13, Linsey Duncan-Pitt wrote:

> Thank you Neil, Keith and Paul

>

> This is really helpful information.  I saw a presentation on this a little while ago but gleaned from that and the WebPA resources that there were checks and balances.  However the real experience of people using it at the degree classification module level is what I was really interested in.  I like the safety net options you mentioned Neil.

>

> Best Regards

> Linsey



--

====================================================

Lynette Johns-Boast

Lecturer

Research School of Computer Science

The ANU College of Engineering and Computer Science CS&IT Building 108 The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200 Australia



T: +61 2 6125 4526

F: +61 2 6125 0010

M: +61 405 611 859

W: http://cecs.anu.edu.au



Available Tuesday, Wednesday & Thursday



________________________________

Important Notice: the information in this email and any attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to an intended recipient, you should delete it from your system immediately without disclosing its contents elsewhere and advise the sender by returning the email or by telephoning a number contained in the body of the email. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of Liverpool John Moores University.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
January 2018
November 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
March 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager