JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH Archives

OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH  April 2013

OCC-HEALTH April 2013

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Hepatitis B Serology

From:

Susan Gorton <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Occupational Health mailing list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:49:44 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

I think it needs to be understood that there is a difference between immunity and longevity of immunity. So bear in mind what you are trying to achieve. In most occupational programmes it is long term immunity so the exposed worker can go away safe and stay safe over time.



Even one dose of Hep B is likely to produce some immunity.



The second dose ensures that the number of people who are starting to become immune increases and the third dose is to try and increase that number AND prolong the period that the immunity lasts. If someone was going travelling 2 doses one week apart is likely to provide sufficient lasting protection for their holiday.



A standard 3 dose primary course given at 0,1, 6 months is the recommended primary course for resources and efficacy and if over 100, you're done. No more 5 year booster.



Testing down the line, post needlestick perhaps, may show a reduction over time but probably still>10 which is still immune. Theoretically even less than 10 may still be immune as there is an amnestic response potential when the immunity is not measurable by current processes but would kick in if body is infected with antigen. You would still give a booster NOT to provide immunity as they already have it but to again send them away safe over time.



The Hepatitis board did some research which said if after a compliantly attended primary course the level was less than 20 miu/ml, 2 boosters one month apart was more likely to get the individual >100 than 1 booster alone. Think how many times you have boosted tested and had to give a second. It saves a blood test and costs a vaccine dose so who knows if it is worth it.



Most of America DOES NOT test based on the amnestic principle though some of them are introducing it now.



Regards

Sue



Susan Gorton | OH Nurse Manager | Occupational Health Department | Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust | Level 3, Ormond House, 26-27 Boswell St., London WC1N 3JZ |020 7405 9200 Ext 0247 | DD to OHD 020 78138554 | Direct Fax 020 78138355 | Mobile 07833294568



Please be advised that all e-mail communication relevant to assisting in the management of the OH process will be printed and entered into the individual's OH file or copied and added as an electronic note on their electronic OH record. This may therefore be disclosed under the Data Protection Act (1998).



> -----Original Message-----

> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On

> Behalf Of Sarah L Redfearn

> Sent: 18 April 2013 08:59

> To: [log in to unmask]

> Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] Hepatitis B Serology

> 

> Hi Cathy,

> 

> We vaccinate the student healthcare workers here in Hull as they commence

> their training.  When the scheduling for Hep B changed in the Green Book

> we considered it and the reason for the changes.  We interpreted the

> information to mean that the scheduling changed as a result of non

> compliance of the course of vaccinations in a sexual health setting with their

> patients.

> 

> Given the environment that we are in we decided to continue with the 0, 1

> & 5 month regime as we have a relatively reasonable compliance rate.  The

> other considerations where whether there was any evidence to suggest that

> if a student didn't have their course exactly as scheduled, would this cause

> them some risk and of course cost is always considered as the extended

> schedule includes an extra vaccine and having the students released from

> lectures.

> 

> I have attached the information we received from Glaxo and this assisted us

> to make the decision to stick with the shorter schedule as we (the team) feel

> that this is the best option for us and our clients.

> 

> I know that I haven't answered your question exactly but it might offer you

> something useful.

> 

> Sarah

> 

> 

> 

>  ...................................................................................................................

> 

> Sarah Redfearn  Dip HE Occupational Health Occupational Health Nurse

> Advisor University of Hull Hull, HU6 7RX

> 

> www.hull.ac.uk

> 01482 466010

> 

> 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On

> Behalf Of Cathy Howells

> Sent: 17 April 2013 11:16

> To: [log in to unmask]

> Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] Hepatitis B Serology

> 

> Dear List,

> Following on from Diane's excellent advice below, I would like to ask if

> anyone does postpone Hep B serology until after the 4th dose, especially in

> Health Care Workers (EPP and non EPP)?

> Some of our nurses are asking why we are still testing after the third dose

> when the guidance is to wait and test after the 4th dose. My response has

> been that this then delays our knowledge of the employee's hep B status.

> I would be interested to hear if anyone does do this and whether or not it

> causes any concerns?

> 

> Thank you

> 

> Cathy

> 

> ********************************

> Please remove this footer before replying.

> 

> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES:

> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html

> 

> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:

> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH

> 

> ********************************

> Please remove this footer before replying.

> 

> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES:

> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html

> 

> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:

> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH

*********************************************************************************************************

This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient please inform the sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it.

Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

Thank you for your co-operation.

*********************************************************************************************************




********************************

Please remove this footer before replying.



OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES:

http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html



CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:

http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager