JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  April 2013

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING April 2013

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Who is afraid of the Public?

From:

Dorothee Richter <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:59:44 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

Dear All, maybe someone could drop in?



ICA London

"Who's afraid of the public?" Symposium 4th May 2013   11:30am – 7:30pm



Despite all the yearning for new publics and the attempts to include ever wider and more diverse audiences, one has to suspect that these are mere gestures of inclusion driven by the desire to produce the visiting numbers of an audience rather than constituting a public. A public that would not be just a distracted critique, as Walter Benjamin put it.

If participation is the new spectacle, as Diedrich Diedrichsen once provocatively stated, how are we then to go beyond the given proliferation of art communication, mediation and education? When participation has both become an apt strategy of governmentality falling in place with the discourse of the fear of the public and is constantly generated by communicating via social media and its constant flow of information and relations at a fast pace, what are then the potentials to open up a new discourse on what public and participation in its constitution means in the 21st century? How has neoliberal, developer driven urbanization teamed up with the logics of the spectacle and the taming of the public? What is the role that art and its communicative potentials can play as a critical force that is implied in these contexts? How can public agency be performed?

How can one remain true to achieving the seemingly more and more utopian idea of political agency for all, of access, distribution, representation and education? How can we constitute and live both subjectivity and community? What kind of social relations, aesthetic representations and potentials of self-expression have both the desire for reclaiming physical public space and new digital media from emails to blogs to twitter produced? What kind of different ideas about access to and production of knowledge and representation have they fostered? Did they impact on political agency and are these spaces of self-representation and self-mediation more accessible? Is the being-with of entities profoundly changed through the digital space?

Concept: Elke Krasny (Academy of Fine Arts Vienna/ University of Reading), Dorothee Richter (Postgraduate Programme in Curating, ZHdK Zurich / University of Reading), Silvia Simoncelli (Postgradute Programme in Curating, Zurich.)



Moderator: Elke Krasny

Schedule

11.30am – 12.15pm


Simon Sheikh, Curator and Programme Director of the MFA Curating at Goldsmiths, University of London

12.15pm - 1pm


Marie Luise Angerer, Professor at the Academy of Media Arts in Cologne

1pm – 1.30pm


Lunch

1.30pm - 2.15pm


Sergio Edelsztein, Director of the Centre for Contemporary Art in Tel Aviv and Curator of the Israel Pavilion at the Venice Biennial 2013

2.15pm - 3pm


Aria Spinelli, critic/curator based in Milan

3pm - 3.45pm


Liza Fior, muf architecture, London

3.45pm - 4.15pm


Break

4.15pm - 5.30pm


Film Screening curated by John Canciani, Director of Winterthur Short Film Festival.



Simon Sheikh:

How do institutions institute social relations and produce subjectivity? How do they conjure up the phantom that is the public? This presentation will look at the public role of the institution not through public policies or even politics of aesthetics, but through how they institute through imaginary address, but set into form through the formatting of the institution itself. The institution will be seen not so much as a place, but rather as a mode of address, which thus also offers the possibility for addressing differently, and addressing difference as a political concept, implying notions such as alignment, alienation and antagonism.

Marie Luise Angerer:

Who's afraid of the public? or Art as Self enhancement

Culture and art have turned into a tool of self enhancement. Culture and art have become a major field of investment, economically and psychically. Sustainability and effectivity, affective entertainment, sensual discourse and the “audience as prosumers” are the buzzwords for this process of economisation of art. These aspects have already been analysed by researchers and theorists, but the relatively new tendency of affectization as a strategy of power — concerning art making, art exhibition and the audience – needs further attention. Therefore the relationship of de-framing (the image), the bio-mediated body, time and movement as a matter of affect will be analysed as a new dispositif.

Sergio Edelsztein

A Trojan Horse or A Fig Leaf? On the Unbearable Lightness of Curating Political

The presentation will try to summarize some thoughts that have been growing in my mind in the last years, as I became more and more aware of a basic contradiction in the political consequences of some aspects in my curatorial practice.

This refers to my on-going practice of programming and showing video works by Israeli artists (mostly Jewish) that deal with the political reality within the Occupied Palestinian Territories and its consequences. These works are extremely critical of the policies of different Israeli governments. However, several of the works also reflect on the impact that the on-going friction has inside the Jewish population itself.

Lively discussions often erupt with the public after these presentations that present a more complex reality than people are used to see on the TV news. But often, the impression that stays with the public is a mirror image of what I intended to show, highlighting a public opinion debate that has virtually no impact on reality.

Aria Spinelli:

The constitution of resistance in independent curatorial praxis

Within the context of the inhabitants’ political struggle against the financial implementation to the urban re-qualification of Isola neighbourhood in Milan, Isola Art Centre found the core to its artistic and curatorial practice. Whilst renowned processes of re-qualification in cosmopolitan cities such as New York or Berlin engage in an initial repopulation of neighbourhoods on part of the creative class, thus helping real estate agencies buy and sell at higher prices, the artist and curators of Isola Art Centre activated forms of political and social representation of resistance against the on-going process of gentrification. In a close and almost daily contact with activists groups and institutions to legally re-obtain a public park, Bert Theis and Mariette Schiltz worked alongside generations of young artists and curators in order to raise awareness towards the on-going fight. Thus the use of the term, initially mentioned by Istanbul-based curator Vasif Kortun, and recently revisited by Bert himself, Fight-Specificity refers to a political practice in an art-historical and contemporary context.

Liza Fior:

Liza Fior will present Villa Frankenstein, muf's contribution to the Venice Biennale.



FILM PROGRAMME by John Canciani –

The public as an audience:

Play / Christoph Giradet , Matthias Müller / Germany / 2003 / 7’ / exp

Audiences in movies. In Play, the onscreen action can only be seen reflected in the facial expressions and gestures of the audience. In sequences of analogous reactions, individual behaviour condenses into collective behaviour. The event is transferred from the stage to the hall; audience members become the actors in an unpredictable drama.



The public as a critique:

Crni Film - Black Film / Želimir Žilnik / Jugoslavia / 1971 / 14’ / doc

One night Žilnik picks up a group of homeless men from the streets of Novi Sad and takes them home. While they enjoy themselves in his home, the filmmaker tries to “solve the problem of the homeless” bringing along a film camera as a witness. He speaks to social workers, ordinary people and policemen. They all close their eyes in the face of the problem.



The public as a society:

This is Alaska / Mårten Nilsson, Gunilla Heilborn / Sweden / 2009 / 11’ / fic exp

A group of people have moved to Alaska.
 They are searching for a higher level of freedom.



The public as an open source:

Bradley Manning had secrets / Adam Butcher / United Kingdom / 6’ / ani

The story of Bradley Manning, not as a Wikileaks ‘hacktivist’, but as a young American soldier simultaneously going through a crisis-of-conscious and a crisis-of-identity. Animated in a rotoscoped pixel-art style and using dialogue from Bradley’s online conversations, the film explores issues of personal and political secrets, digital identity and alienation.



The public as a division of classes:

Dizem que os caes veem coisas - Dogs are said to see things / Guto Parente / Brasil / 2012 / 14’ / fic

An omen. A shred of time. Suddenly the huge-bellied man jumps into the pool, holding a glass of whisky.



The public as a political movement:

Untitled (Zimbabwean Queen of Rave) / Dan Halter / Simbabwe / 2005 / 4’ / Exp

In 1991 Rozalla’s single “Everybody’s Free (To Feel Good)” was released. The film expresses a personal reality and the cultural gap between white and black that I was experiencing.



The public as an institution of ethics:

Geliebt – Be loved / Jan Soldat / Germany / 2010/ 16’ / doc

Life’s about two things: firstly, being loved, and secondly not being alone. “Geliebt” is not a film about the pros and cons of emotional and sexual relationships with animals, it shows about exploiting yourself and how to perceived by the public by showing it in a documentary. This film questiones the border of the society.

This film is rated 18 and can offend sensibilities



ICA

Conference and film programme organised by the Research Platform in Curating at the Department of Art at the University of Reading http://www.reading.ac.uk/art/pg-research/art-postgraduate-rsearch-zurich-phd.aspx  in association with Postgraduate Programme in Curating, University of the Arts Zurich www.curating.org

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

at

Institute of Contemporary Arts

12 Carlton House Terrace

London

SW1Y 5AHTickets / Information

020 7930 3647

http://www.ica.org.uk/







--

Dr. Dorothee Richter

Head of Postgraduate Program in Curating

Institute Cultural Studies in the Arts

Zurich University of the Arts

Hafnerstr. 31

8005 Zürich



Skype: dorothee.richter



www.curating.org study program

www.on-curating.org webjournal

www.curatingdegreezero.org archive

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager