JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB  March 2013

CCP4BB March 2013

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Best practice for transformed PDB coordinates?

From:

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:17:41 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (132 lines)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dear James,

if I understand correctly you want to transform structure B onto
structure A and then compare the crystallographic packing of A and B.
I might be wrong, but I think the most convenient way for the users
would be a display program which can handle two different global
coordinate systems (that of A and that of B) so that the symmetry
operators of B recreate the original crystal packing of B _after_ it was
mapped onto A.

I am not aware of a program which handles such two different global
coordinate systems, and if I am correct your last assumption is correct:
you have to "[..] accept that my aligned coordinates should no longer
be expected to recreate the packing environment [...]"

If you want to keep track within the PDB-file, maybe for later
reference, you could just add REMARK cards that explain what you did,
i.e. contain the original PDB-ID, transformation operator and the
reference PDB-ID.

As a work-around in case I did understand you correctly, you could
save the contacting symmetry equivalents of B into its own PDB file
(e.g. in coot) _before_ the transformation, then apply the
transformation so that the contacting molecules are transformed the
same way as B.

If somebody has a shorter way, I am happy to learn.

Best regards,
Tim

On 03/13/2013 01:57 PM, James Davidson wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> 
> 
> This is my first post to the group - so "Hello"!  I have searched 
> with not much success to find an answer to my question, so I
> thought I would try posting here for some expert advice.
> 
> I should start by saying that I am not a crystallographer, but
> please don't hold that against me!
> 
> 
> 
> I am working with PDB files that are being aligned to reference 
> structures, indirectly by (a) using the alignment tools in PyMOL, 
> then (b) extracting the transformation matrix and re-applying this
> to the ATOM / HETATM entries outside of PyMOL (to avoid atom
> reordering / atom charging / etc that occurs when directly
> exporting from PyMOL).  Anyway, what I wanted to know is is there a
> way that I could (or should?) reference that the PDB file
> coordinates have been transformed?  Is there a way of preserving
> the ability of tools (eg PyMOL) to legitimately recreate the
> symmetry mates from the transformed coordinates if I eg apply the
> same transform to some of the data in CRYST1 and SCALE1, SCALE2,
> SCALE3?  Or should I instead be adding ORIGX1, ORIGX2, ORIGX3
> entries to show that a transformation has been applied?  Or,
> indeed, should I just accept that my aligned coordinates should no
> longer be expected to recreate the packing environment?
> 
> 
> 
> I have read through what I think is the correct section of the PDB 
> documentation, but I must confess that my lack of expertise means
> I am in danger of approaching an old(?) problem through naïve trial
> and error!
> 
> 
> 
> Any help / advice greatly appreciated.
> 
> 
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> 
> 
> James
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> 
PLEASE READ: This email is confidential and may be privileged. It is
intended for the named addressee(s) only and access to it by anyone
else is unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or
copying of the contents of this email or any action taken (or not
taken) in reliance on it is unauthorised and may be unlawful. If you
have received this email in error, please notify the sender or
[log in to unmask] Email is not a secure method of communication
and the Company cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or
completeness of this message or any attachment(s). Please check this
email for virus infection for which the Company accepts no
responsibility. If verification of this email is sought then please
request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated, any views or opinions
presented are solely those of the author and do not represent those of
the Company.
> 
> The Vernalis Group of Companies 100 Berkshire Place Wharfedale Road
>  Winnersh, Berkshire RG41 5RD, England Tel: +44 (0)118 938 0000
> 
> To access trading company registration and address details, please
> go to the Vernalis website at www.vernalis.com and click on the
> "Company address and registration details" link at the bottom of
> the page.. 
> ______________________________________________________________________

- --
>
> 
- --
Dr Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iD8DBQFRQIqFUxlJ7aRr7hoRAkJtAJ0Xt/HX2ptpvV6Dk59lme9wDllPrgCg83um
YfBTeC8MRbOmomq/CUUCtcw=
=PUZE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager