Could there be a better response than Pat's "Bring me my axe"? There's the challenge!
Cheers
L.
On 27 Feb 2013, at 16:47, David Kernohan wrote:
"Ten years later: why open educational resources have not noticeably
affected higher education and why we should care"
http://t.co/6Vb3M4lQbI
I don't want to have a go at this paper specifically(*), but this is an
egregious example of a tendency that suggests that OER would be a far
better idea if it was just under more control, better organised and more
structured. I hear this kind of argument a reasonable amount and I'd love
to have a response to it that doesn't make me sound like a smelly hippy.
With the understanding that the wider ukoer community most likely gets why
solutions like this are unviable, I offered a prize for the most
interesting response (as a blog post) via twitter - and I want to offer if
here too.
One large drink (of the author's choice) for the best (by my personal
judgement... cause, hey, I'm buying the drink) blogged response to the
paper from a UKOER community member.
Deadline would be the start of CETIS13 (12th March)
David
* I'll let you do that....
--
David Kernohan
UKOER Programme Manager
eLearning Innovation Team
JISC
e:[log in to unmask]
p:3rd Floor, Beacon House, Bristol BS8 1QU
s:david.kernohan
t: dkernohan, ukoer
m: 07917599296
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anything in this message which does not clearly relate to the official
work of the sender's organisation shall be understood as neither given
nor endorsed by that organisation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Lorna M. Campbell
JISC CETIS Assistant Director
University of Strathclyde
Glasgow
Email: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Phone: +44141 548 3072
Skype: lorna120768
The University of Strathclyde is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, number SC015263.
|