For completeness ..it is because I could replace the whole team that was
dealing with the WNs in the gLite era, put my hands on something that
was "there" not touched even in the gLite era since long time.
Yes - it was really horrible that I couldn't managed ti .
Cristina
Sam Skipsey wrote:
>
>
>
> On 27 February 2013 16:35, Stephen Burke <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> LHC Computer Grid - Rollout [mailto:[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> > On Behalf Of Henry Nebrensky said:
> > Was there any sort of consultation process behind the decision
> not to
> > produce a tarball?
>
> I don't think there was a decision not to produce one, just an
> absence of a process to do it.
>
> Stephen
>
>
> IIRC, there was a very long period where the tarball kept being
> brought up in GDBs as an important thing that some sites needed
> (especially for the WN tarball), and eventually, after basically
> nothing happened for EMI-2 despite it being made very clear that the
> lack of a WN tarball was a blocker for several UK sites, Matt ended up
> being saddled with the role of WN tarball provider.
> See: https://ggus.eu/tech/ticket_show.php?ticket=74675
> and
> https://ggus.eu/ws/ticket_info.php?ticket=81496
>
> for the whole horrible saga.
>
> Sam
>
> --
> Scanned by iCritical.
>
>
--
Cristina Aiftimiei - EMI Project
Ist. Naz. di Fisica Nucleare - Padova
Address: via F. Marzolo, 8 - 35131 Padova - ITALY
Phone: +39.049.967.7362
Mobile: +39.3460230488
|