Use a parametric modulator. The PM is orthogonal to the task, so it
shouldn't change the beta estimates.
Also, if the rating occurs after the trials, then you might consider a
second condition for the rating period.
Best Regards, Donald McLaren
=================
D.G. McLaren, Ph.D.
Research Fellow, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and
Harvard Medical School
Postdoctoral Research Fellow, GRECC, Bedford VA
Website: http://www.martinos.org/~mclaren
Office: (773) 406-2464
=====================
This e-mail contains CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION which may contain PROTECTED
HEALTHCARE INFORMATION and may also be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED and which is
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the
reader of the e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you are in possession of confidential and privileged
information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail
unintentionally, please immediately notify the sender via telephone at (773)
406-2464 or email.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 6:48 AM, H. Nebl
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear Ruth,
>
>
> I have some doubts how a "normal" regressor would actually affect/disturb the model. If this results in something like 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 ... with 1 each time a trial is presented and the subject giving a specific rating, then basically this is a stick function not convolved with the HRF and not taking into account the hemodynamic shift. This should probably affect your regressors of interest, for example the regressor of no interest might actually "steal" some aspects from your regressors of interest.
>
> Therefore parametric modulation seems to be more plausible to me (as it is already fixed to the actual trial onset and not to a whole volume), this way you could also test whether the rating has an influence or not. You would still have to decide whether to use a single parametric modulator (taking into account the four different ratings, which might have a linear or non-linear relationship) or four parametric modulators (one for each of the rating categories).
>
> Leaving this aside, if you don't expect any influence on the BOLD response due to different ratings why do you want to include such a regressor of no interest? Or is it rather something like pain rating, with higher rating values for example resulting in larger movements?
>
>
> Best,
>
> Helmut
|