A year or two ago we switched from Fedora to Scientific Linux 6. It is a
free repackaging of Red Hat Enterprise, so it should be a
straightforward shift from Fedora. It is supported long term, and has
backing from several large labs (fermilab, CERN, etc)
CCP4, Coot, etc. seem to be well-supported in it. Anything package for
RH Enterprise should be fine.
On 01/17/13 11:33, David Roberts wrote:
> I'm sorry to re-hash this issue, but I just wanted to know what the
> present general consensus is on linux flavors. I teach a
> crystallography class every 2 years, and I have a small cluster of
> computers running fedora, but the deal is that by the time I get
> around to my class, fedora has routinely gone up at least 2 levels
> since my last upgrade, meaning that the latest software and things are
> difficult at best to load on.
>
> I'm OK with any linux, I just want one that will be able to run the
> majority (if not all) of the typical crystallography packages (cns,
> ccp4, coot, etc...). I also would like one that works well with nfs
> and local file sharing. I can upgrade fedora, no problem, but I
> thought I may branch out if others think there are better flavors out
> there.
>
> Thanks so much
>
> Dave Roberts
--
=======================================================================
All Things Serve the Beam
=======================================================================
David J. Schuller
modern man in a post-modern world
MacCHESS, Cornell University
[log in to unmask]
|