It did occur to me that the IQ wouldn't be understood, after a quick
post, and I got caught up in a long gay sailing story and got delayed.
IQ testing measures brain function relative to age and gender, at least
the stuff here in Aust does.
(This is done at UNSW and I once made printing plates for these tests
which are marked using a computer and scanner. trivia)
Because gay male brains are smaller and symmetrical, compared to
straight male brains which have a larger hemisphere on one side, and
also gay brains have a larger connection between hemispheres, gay male
brains develop much more quickly and at a younger age and hence a
straight IQ test based on straight male gender will be higher. Hence the
significant figure of gay males having IQ measurements in the top 3
percent. Also, gay male brains have a different spatial thinking,
topological mosaic structure, which is far quicker then a cardinal idea
of space which requires a larger brain mass as in straight male brain.
Since IQ testing is also based on a limited time, say 15 minutes, for
each test, this also accounts for a higher score. This involves several
tests, not just a single test. IQ scores fall as you get older, also. A
topographical understanding of stats in also needed.
It gets complex and involves relation of forces... a statistical figure
is not an identified number, but a force vector. So a specific example
cannot be given unlike the sort stuff that follows Aristotle confused as
neo-Platonist
There is a lot of myth around IQ testing saying it is all cultural, but
that is ignorant crap, of course. IQ is not a category and to say so
confuses index and category.
On 07/11/12 03:38, Lawrence Upton wrote:
> That's about it, I think.
|