Bob, you always make it all worthwhile! Yours in honor of mathematics,
Sheila E
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:31 PM, bob grumman <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
> Very nice, Sheila. But, oh, the urge it gave
> me to make "systems (quite
> systemic, quite
> voracious, quite)"
> "systems (quite
> systemic, quite
> voracious, quite
> quite)"
>
> But don't do it!
>
> Bob
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Sheila Murphy
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 5:54 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: SNAP / Murph
>
> Thank you, Stephen. This means a lot, and I shall reflect upon what you say
> about the different parts!
>
> Best, Sheila
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]
> >wrote:
>
> With the exception of not 'getting' the last 4.5 lines of the first
>> stanza, I love the viola/bow mimetic moves of the rest. The zest, Sheila!
>>
>> Stephen V
>>
>> --- On Tue, 11/27/12, Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> From: Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: SNAP / Murph
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Date: Tuesday, November 27, 2012, 2:02 PM
>>
>> always the viola clef im
>> pinges on alleged neu
>> tra la laity
>> be "course" (as my friend
>> MEP fresh from NJ
>> would say)
>>
>> the lamentations strike
>> one, with their piercing
>> volatility
>> their voice box
>> shielded
>> as in hooded
>> as in and out
>> of justice
>> systems (quite
>> systemic, quite
>> voracious, quite)
>>
>> a momentary symphony,
>> my train case function
>> full of extreme unction,
>> says the friar
>> so and so and so
>>
>> one hears placating melody
>> by memory in arrears
>> one's host
>> age taking
>> its toll
>> on
>> and on and on
>>
>> sheila e. murphy
>>
>>
>>
|