Dear Chris
> The problem is here you are appealing to Aristotle
No, I was answering your question without reference to him. There was
no need to. You did not add "Please answer with reference to
Aristotle, Kant, V I Lenin."
> and the categories
backed up by Kantian aesthetics which support Aristotle's poetics
which
is homophobia.
Well, I have never thought about the last point, never occurred to
me, but no to the rest of it
>This is based on an empiricism provided by Aristotle and
Kant which is claimed as a truth since this is empirical and material
reality. (It confuses individual with universal forces.)
Universal forces? I know them. Poorly-absorbed reading and pomposity
are common
> VI Lenin well understood that this empirical approach to history
was
idealist. (David B argues an idealist understanding of history contra
Marx.)
> It is an autopoeitic self supporting system which is narcissism.
This is
also the critique I was getting at with the reply to IQ tests. This
defines heterosexual and the finite end to this category.
Well, I suspect you know a great deal more than I about narcissism,
Chris.
> This is why gay cannot be the same species as heterosexual male, if
you
follow that this cannot be a question of species. Poetry can no
longer
be written according to what is laid out by Artistotle's poetics. It
is
as simple as that.
Nothing I can say can do full justice to that.
I'll leave you to your Elton John collection
L
|