JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  November 2012

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING November 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: November Theme: Curating on and through web-based platforms

From:

bronac ferran <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

bronac ferran <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:07:10 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (127 lines)

Hi and not overprolonging this - picking up on this thread of discussion
between Marc and Martin as well as perhaps a newly felt nostalgia for the
90s I was reminded of something James Wallbank said at the Moot in another
panel this week about how he would be saying more or less the same thing he
first said at Next Five Minutes in 1999 - I asked him afterwards about this
given the level of shift in terms of access to technologies since then and
he said nothing much had changed. I have therefore dug out the following
link and see that of course it was visionary and maybe this is what we are
missing these days and looking back to try to find. .

lowtech.org/projects/n5m3/

The Moot was conceived initially by the AHRC as a 'fair'  to encourage
people to get their hands on stuff rather than just listen to presentations
- it was focussed at the outset on the digital humanities where actually
there is a new level of excitement about some of what is being discovered
or revealed. This mood may be what is reminding some of us of early days of
excitement in what is now ubiquitous 'new media' culture. The idea of a
village fayre was realised in the Hackspace which I was invited to help
curate which allowed for proximity and juxtaposition (eg The British
Library were beside Active Ingredient - the Makers Guild beside university
of Southampton and Graeme Earl...body>data>space was beside the Open
Knowledge Foundation and British Museum with its virtual autopsy scanner
etc).  I guess it was hard to get round all the stalls as well as sit
through numerous panels....something to feedback to AHRC when they do an
evaluation.  I would refute seeing this stuff as mere tools...but that is a
much longer discussion.  Tomorrow I am going to hear James Gleick speaking
at the RCA and no doubt will run some of these thoughts through my mind for
some days to come.

So to summarise - the Moot was seeking to be a decentralised, idiosyncratic
event which was nevertheless organised by a research council.  It's
generally agreed there were too many panels (intellectuals often revert to
type) but nevertheless they threw up some ideas which hopefully can be
addressed in other fora in future. Time for Another Next 5 Minutes? (not my
idea but there are some who are mooting it).....
cheers
Bronac



On 22 November 2012 16:51, Martin John Callanan (UCL)
<[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> Hi Marc
>
> There is certainly a lot of art currently being produced that can as easily
> be produced to the same or higher standard using open source programs, and
> be done cheaper with older hardware. There is even things which can only be
> done with open source software.
>
> But to suggest this as the only solution, in my opinion, discounts too
> much. It creates restrictions on the Artist. It would be to keep the artist
> as amateur and hobbyist.
>
> Example, for an artist to work at the level of cutting edge science, for an
> artist to inform science, requires access to that same hardware and
> software. Stuff that can't be made in a garage, it's stuff made by
> the collaboration of nation states and taking the whole career's of world
> leading experts.
>
> Software, be it open source or not, remains a tool: a abstraction of the
> computer, to allow its manipulation. To make to function how I want more
> easily than writing machine or assembly code.
>
> Photoshop may not be the image editing software I'd design, but it works,
> or I can make it work. I don't need to make Photoshop to edit images.
> A Raspberry Pi may work to play video files, but there will be times when
> you have to spent ten times the money on  a Brightsign player with
> it's propriety s/w. If an artist isn't actively involved in the development
> of open source s/w, then I don't see there is a difference in them using
> open or not.
>
> We are still talking about acquired tools. A recycled computer makes better
> use of finite resources, but it remains an abstraction as much as a shiny
> new one. The artist hasn't mined the minerals and etched the chipset. The
> old and new are the same to the artist: a tool.
>
>
> m
>
>
> On 22 November 2012 16:07, marc <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Lindsay,
> >
> > Looking forward to hearing about your experience at
> http://319scholes.org/in New York...
> >
> > At Furtherfield, all the tech we use is now recycled and reused. We are
> > completely open source, this includes the set up of the exhibiting space
> > and administration. Control over one's tools of creative production is
> now,
> > as significant as having control over one's creative ideas. And, media
> art
> > as an art practice, has gained various attributes which allow processes
> of
> > self-autonomy. There is something about working with technology and the
> > Internet that changes our perception of the world, and how we operate in
> > it. Other than the world becomes less definable as nations and states. It
> > evolves into a way of engaging and understanding other things, other
> > worlds, other possibilities; touching on aspects of being able to re-edit
> > 'source' materials, whether it be hardware, software or code, and
> bringing
> > this knowledge with its learned experiences into, real-life situations.
> >
> > This philosophy or tech orientated agency I feel is (as Access Space do),
> > now one of the most significant factors of being aware of contemporary
> > social contexts, and integration of ecological responsibility needs full
> > support by all art venues and institutions right across the board.
> >
> > So, regarding your approach to open source philosophy, I am wondering how
> > it's working at the moment and how is this (if at all) challenging those
> > artists who come your venue expecting to use propriety software?
> >
> > Wishing you well.
> >
> > marc
> >
> >
>



-- 
Bronaċ

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager