JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives


MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives


MEDIEVAL-RELIGION@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Home

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Home

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION  November 2012

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION November 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: "Deconsecrate" (WAS: Re: [M-R] Feasts and Saints of the Day: Novemb...

From:

Christopher Crockett <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

medieval-religion - Scholarly discussions of medieval religious culture <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:29:52 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (169 lines)

medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture

From: John Briggs <[log in to unmask]>

>On 27/11/2012 19:48, Christopher Crockett wrote:

>> as i say, it was a passing reference (in the opening passage of a charter)
and i didn't pay much attention to it --except to note with surprise that the
relatively modest priory (the church survives) seems to have had a "cloister"
in the late 11th or early 12th c.

>> (this, btw, is also the first and only time i ever came across the mention
of any priory having a cloister.)


> I think we've had this argument before, but the difference between a 
priory and an abbey is simply that the former is headed by a prior and 
the latter by an abbot. 


you've gotten no argument from me about that --the OED on The Innernets says
that that is the situation, so it must be true.

i believe that the previous discussion (hardly an "argument") was over what to
call a collegial/collegiate church which was headed by an abbot.

i have an 1140s document in which the clerical son of Louis VI/brother of
Louis VII refers to himself as "abbot of the royal abbeys"
[_abbas...abbatiorum_? i can't recall] --of which there were 6 or 8-- so i got
it into my head that it was o.k. to refer to these institutions as "abbeys"
and inquired on the List if my fantasy was indeed Reality Based.

someone here (no names, please) disagreed, insisting upon the appellation
"church"

as i recall, little blood was spilt, the ListMommie did not have to intervene
and the discussion died a quiet and welcome death.

>This could depend as much as anything on the order (not that there were
"orders" in the late 11th or early 12th centuries, of course.) For example,
all Cistercian houses, regardless of size, are abbeys, and most Augustinian
houses, again regardless of size, are priories. For Benedictine houses (as
they were to become), it *does* tend to depend on size, but also on whether
the priory is notionally a daughter of another house. 


though the term "order" might not appear in the 11-12th c. documents, it is
certainly useful to use that term to distinguish between what later became
"orders" --i.e., if the word "order" didn't exist we would have to create it.

among the idiosyncratic, aberrant quirks of the Western Fringe of Europe it
may well be the fact that most "Augustinian houses" are priories.

this is certainly not the case on the Main Land.

in fact, i can't really think of a singular "Augustinian" (11th-12 c.) house
i've come across in France which was headed by a prior --collegial churches
always seem to be headed by an abbot, both before and after their reform.

"Augustinian" is the dispositive word here --it is only applicable (and that
only rarely, in the documents) to refer to secular collegials/abbeys which
have been taken over and reformed.

for instance, when Bishop Godfrey of Chartres reformed the secular church of
St. Mary Madeleine of Chateaudun, he addressed the newly installed abbot of
the place thus:

...Archenbaude, Beate-Marie-Magdalene Castriduni venerabilis abbas,...in
ecclesia vestra canonicum habitum secundum sancti Augustini instituta indutus
est...

such mentions of St. Augustine are rare, but do occur.

to my [very limited] knowledge, the word "regula" does not.

when Bishop Ivo of Chartres (Godfrey's immediate predecessor) reformed the
secular collegial of St. John of Chartres in 1099, he said

"Ego...Ivo...Carnotensis...episcopus...in pretaxata Sancti Joannis ecclesia
canonicos tales esse decernimus, qui proprietate posthabita canonicam
haberent vitam juxta beati Augustini institutionem...

in 1119 Bishop Godfrey confirmed Ivo's reform using exactly the same words.

so, it seems clear to me that what was in play here may well have been the
"Rule of St. Augustine" though, as i say, i don't think "regula" is ever used;
and i suppose these houses *could* be called "Augustinian" though that is not
the way they were referred to.

>What you may be thinking of is similar to the situation with the "alien
priories" in England, which were mostly dependants of French houses. Most of
these were in fact what we would call "granges" (a word which I would hazard a
guess to not exist in France...) rather than actual "priories". 

well, a good Rule of Thumb to follow might be, if there is no "prior" at the
place, there ain't no "priory."

calling a "grange" a "priory" is, well, it's just Kinky, John.

those places sound to me like they were just money pumps, whose sole function
was to suck the local profits out of the country to the Mother House.

rather like a McDonald's franchise --but all Suck, without any goods being
produced.


but, i will Defend to the Death your right to call them anything you wish, out
there on the Kinky Western Fringe.


my use of the term "priory" in my original post was quite deliberate and, i
believe, accurate (even though "priory" [in Latin] isn't found in the
documents, but there is a prior mentioned with that title) and did not depend
at all on the size of the place.  i believe the smallest one i came across was
said to have consisted of three monks (maybe without one of them being called
a "prior").

if it was headed by a prior....[viday soupra]

i believe the place i was thinking of --which was desecrated and had to be
undeconsecrated-- was a relatively small priory of Marmoutier, which had at
least a baker's dozen priories in the diocese of Chartres (MM was a house
favored by the "Thibaudian" counts of Blois/Chartres after they got kicked out
of Tours round about 1,000).

the largest of these MM priories was that of St. Martin[-au-Val] outside of
Chartres

http://ariadne.org/cc/abbeys/st-martin/nave.jpg

http://ariadne.org/cc/abbeys/st-martin/choir.jpg

http://ariadne.org/cc/abbeys/st-martin/apse.jpg

which also happens to be (by far) the largest surviving example of 11th c.
architecture in the diocese.

i have always assumed that it had a cloister --though mention of one does not
seem to have survived in the documents.

and, yes, Brenda, all the Cluniac dependencies were priories, no matter what
their size, if they were headed by a Prior --and they *never* have an Abbot.

this includes one of the largest, St. Martin-des-Champs outside the walls of
Paris.

but not the Cluniac dependency of Marcigny (not far from Cluny), which seems
to have been a kind of retirement home for noble women who were found to be
underfoot when their kids grew up (Countess Adela of Blois/Chartres and the
Lady of Le Puiset, Vicountess of Chartres retired there in the 1120s).

that place was headed up by....wait for it... a Prioress.

funny how that works, isn't it?

c

**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager