The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  November 2012

DISABILITY-RESEARCH November 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Why do Bond villains need facial scars?

From:

Andrea Shettle <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Tue, 6 Nov 2012 10:04:53 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (159 lines)

Thank you for this. When I saw there was Yet Another Bond Movie out, I was
wondering whether there would be any improvement in how it depicts women,
or people with disabilities or disfigurement.

Other related pet peeves for me:

1. Physical or mobility impairments used to symbolize a "broken spirit"
(ie, with the idea that "broken" body = "broken" spirit). There was one
book I read in which a girl becomes mobility impaired at the same time as
she becomes "broken" in spirit and then is abruptly cured of her
impairment simultaneously with receovering her spirit. Not exactly an
original idea, but usually it isn't done in such a glaringly obvious
manner. Made me want to throw the book across the room.

2. Deaf characters introduced, not as three-dimensional people in their
own right with their own desires and aspirations, but so their difficulty
understanding others can be used for comedic fodder. I remember I was a
little girl the first time that I ever met me in a book--i.e., met a
little girl character who was deaf. And how thrilled I was to finally see
someone just like me in a book ... almost like discovering that I was a
real person after all, because it WAS possible to see me reflected in the
fiction I read. And I remember how betrayed I felt when I realized that
the girl was just there so the other characters--and hearing
readers--could laugh at her difficulty with lipreading.

3. Superhero characters whose super power just "coincidentally" and oh so
conveniently happens to effectively cancel out most of the effects of
their disability, usually leaving me to wonder what on earth the point was
of bothering with either the disability or the super power. (Yes, Dare
Devil, I'm looking at YOU. But that character isn't alone or I might not
have put this on the list.)
      -- Closely related peeve: Disabled superhero whose superpower is
meant to be "ironic" when considered in the context of their
disability, such as a blind person who can "see" the future, or a
person unable to move their own body but who can move objects via
the power of their mind.

4. Any character with a disability who is depicted as being basically
unable to change and grow. But whose mere presence can be such an
"inspirational" (bleh!) catalyst to the change and growth of the "real"
people around them (ie, the non-disabled people). News flash to authors
and film makers: if you're a person, you can change and grow. Only
inanimate objects don't change or grow. And even that rule is not
universal either.

5. Mobility impairment used to symbolize impotence, or lack of virility or
lack of "real" masculinity for men. The cure of which just happens to
coincide with the sudden acquisition of traits usually stereotypically
defined as "masculine". And, possibly, also coinciding with the sudden
acquisition of weapons. Of a certain shape. That suggest symbolization
of, er ... OTHER things. Usually in the approximate size of "big". As if
"real men" cannot be disabled, or vice versa.

6. Any disability used to reinforce the appearance of a female character
as inherently weak, helpless, pathetic, dependent and (usually) childlike.
 And probably also blond, young, and very pretty. Which is supposed to
make their oh so heartbreaking vulnerability and the suffering they
experience all the more tragic. As if it would be perfectly all right for
a person to suffer as long as they're ugly. That's all right then, it's
not a tragedy that this person has lost everything they've ever cared
about because this person is ugly, so who cares about them. Feh!

Thanks for raising this,
Andrea

> <http://www.independent.co.uk>
> News <http://www.independent.co.uk/news/>
>
> Victoria Wright <http://www.independent.co.uk/biography/victoria-wright>
>
> Monday 5 November 2012
> Why do Bond villains need facial scars?
> It's time that filmmakers learnt they don't have to disfigure a
> character to show he's evil. A bad haircut works just as well
>
>
>
> 1 / 1
> Javier Bardem in Skyfall
> Sony Pictures Releasing
> Share
> 0
> inShare <javascript:void(0);>
> +More
> A note of warning: the following article contains film spoilers and
> moments of political correctness that some people may find annoying. I
> went to see Skyfall, excited at the prospect of a Bond film with a
> decent plot, thrilling action sequences, feisty Bond girls, and shots of
> Daniel Craig with his top off. Skyfall has one other classic Bond
> element to it, one that I'd hoped they'd grown out of: the disfigured
> Bond villain.
> I'm referring to the scene where Raoul Silva, played by Javier Bardem,
> suddenly removes his dental face implant to reveal a disfigured mouth
> and missing teeth. It's implied that although Silva was always a bit
> dodgy, it took a facial disfigurement to make him a power-crazed wrong
> 'un. It's shocking in its visual unpleasantness and unexpectedness,
> which was obviously the filmmaker's intention.
> I watched in the cinema with my husband, and half-joked, "I want the
> name of his dentist!" (I'm on the NHS waiting list for dental implants.
> Things are so bad I'm starting to covet my baby daughter's milk teeth.)
> But the truth is the scene made me feel a little uncomfortable.
> As anyone interested in the representation of disability and
> disfigurement in the cinema knows, facial disfigurement is often used to
> represent a character's inner evil. Take the Batman films. Harvey Dent
> starts off in The Dark Knight as an honest, decent lawyer defending the
> rights of the good people of Gotham City. After half his face becomes
> disfigured in an attack, he turns into the murderous Two-Face. God
> forbid anything bad should ever happen to Shami Chakrabarti.
> In the James Bond franchise, there is most famously Blofeld, played by
> Donald Pleasence in 1967's You Only Live Twice. Blofeld had a long
> facial scar to signify his villainy, which was a bit pointless. A grown
> man who conducts his business with a cat on his lap clearly has issues.
> In 1995's Golden Eye, Sean Bean played a double-crossing and facially
> scarred secret agent. Le Chiffre in 2006's Casino Royale had a scarred
> and bleeding left eye. Jaws in 1977's The Spy Who Loved Me and 1979's
> Moonraker, had his, erm, jaws. Zao in 2002's Die Another Day had
> diamonds embedded in his face caused by an exploding briefcase. That
> film left me with a permanent fear of popping into H Samuel. The last
> thing I want is a load of exploding cubic zirconia embedded in my chin.
> It's disappointing that Skyfall, acclaimed for (slightly) improving the
> sexist portrayal of women, is still using facial disfigurement to
> provoke revulsion and promote the stereotype that disfigurement makes a
> person morally abnormal. It's lazy film-making and, particularly within
> the Bond franchise itself, unoriginal. Javier Bardem played a genuinely
> terrifying villain in No Country for Old Men without the need to resort
> to a facial disfigurement. He just used a cold, hard stare and bad, bad
> hair. Surely, the time has come for film-makers to recognise that you
> don't need to give a villain a disfigurement to show he's bad? A dodgy,
> pudding-bowl haircut will do just fine.
>
> Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic
> communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer
>
> ________________End of message________________
>
> This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for
> Disability Studies at the University of Leeds
> (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies).
>
> Enquiries about list administration should be sent to
> [log in to unmask]
>
> Archives and tools are located at:
> www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
>
> You can VIEW, POST, JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web
> page.
>

________________End of message________________

This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies).

Enquiries about list administration should be sent to [log in to unmask]

Archives and tools are located at: www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html

You can VIEW, POST, JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web page.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager