JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CYCLING-AND-SOCIETY Archives


CYCLING-AND-SOCIETY Archives

CYCLING-AND-SOCIETY Archives


CYCLING-AND-SOCIETY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CYCLING-AND-SOCIETY Home

CYCLING-AND-SOCIETY Home

CYCLING-AND-SOCIETY  November 2012

CYCLING-AND-SOCIETY November 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Nineteenth Century Bicycle Design

From:

David Patton <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Cycling and Society Research Group discussion list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:44:53 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (48 lines)

As usual, I find hardly a quibble with Nicholas' splendid outline and interpretations here.

I would only add that there was a collapse of the industrialized bicycle industry in the second half of the 1890s. Unscrupulous financial speculators floated stock offerings that constituted an irrational bubble. When the bubble burst, cycling lost much of its cachet as an activity of proper society, in part, I would suggest, because many society types were taken in by the fraud. (Lawson and Hooley were the most notorious.

After the crash, after the bottom fell out, after the market was thinned, a different class of machine was available at a lower price.

One of Hercules' innovations was hire purchase, further lowering the threshold. But not in the 1880s - 1890s. 

Cheers,

David Patton
Washington, DC

[Sent from my iPhone (with a tiny keyboard) on the Metro ...]

On Nov 19, 2012, at 1:19 PM, "Oddy, Nicholas" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Dunno why this topic seems to be so unpopular, it is one of the most important that cycling history can offer!
> 
> Anyway; development of the rear driven 'safety' is a slow process, not overnight. It is closely linked to tricycle design, itself developing from attempts to degender the high bicycle. The process is therefore one that takes something over 10 years. Lawson is unfairly treated by linear technological histories, his 1879 machine had all the elements of later ones, but the market response was very negative and it would have been a brave maker who tried to enter it having seen the reaction to Lawson. It has to be remembered how limited the bicycle market was in the 1870s and 80s, there was no need for a 'safety bicycle', nor one that was ungendered once wire wheel tricycles had filled this niche. It took someone who believed a different design form could take on the high bicycle on its own terms and had enough of a grasp of publicity to do this, it happened to be Starley, but I'd suggest that the Humber Cripper tricycle of 1884 offered such an obvious pattern that Starley was lucky, a similar or better machine would have been offered by another maker (both Humber and BSA were quick off their marks) which could have adopted the same sales strategy. The design's flexibility took a comparatively long time to be realized, for instance it took another three years before anyone considered the machine as offering potential for a female market that did not want to compromise its dress (which did not exist, it had to be created). I'd strongly recommend anyone researching the period to look to primary, rather than secondary sources, there are vast numbers, mainly unused by so-called cycling historians who keep regurgitating the secondary ones that are often secondary in all senses of the word!
> 
> The working class bit is fascinating. A 12 bob machine in the 1890s would have been a second-hand crock probably of the Velocipede period and I'm not sure how many would want to be seen on one. A 'low grade' machine at this period was £12 new and second-hand prices reflected the fact. I think that Wells''Wheels of Chance'(1896) gives a fairly good impression of the problematic that working class cyclists faced riding second-hand machines of considerably less antiquity and more expense at this period, while a raft of cynical cartoons and articles entitled 'Where 'arry Buys His Crocks' and other such appeared in the cycling press. Things start to change after 1897 and prices for new machines fall fairly rapidly, by the early 20th century a low grade machine was retailing at about £6, a price it retains until the War. There is some interesting material regarding the second hand market that appears in the Scottish cycling press in c1901 where reference is made to the lowest end of the second hand trade going to working class purchasers, notable because it is not disparaging. I commented in my article in 'Cycling and Society' on the spread of the second-hand trade after the design form of machines stabilises in c1900, making it difficult to differentiate old and new, while, of course, the motor car attracted all attention on the roads and effectively shielded cycling from the public attention it enjoyed in the previous decade, a book such as 'Wheels of Chance' would have been unthinkable ten years after it was published. The first UK machine that was deliberately aimed at working class cyclists and priced accordingly was the Hercules of 1928. 
> 
> Nicholas Oddy  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cycling and Society Research Group discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Andrew Wager
> Sent: 19 November 2012 15:15
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Nineteenth Century Bicycle Evolution[Scanned-Clean]
> 
> Historians use an awful lot of hindsight and because of the inadequacies of the sources, they often misinterpret the course of history. I'm effectively using the historical marketplace to judge the success of innovations in the development of the bicycle. The "ordinary" with direct drive onto a very large spoked front wheel had great success in the marketplace for a period and there was considerable modification of that basic design. The history of the "safety" bicycle, with two roughly equal wheels, with the rear one driven by a chain from the central crank was not dissimilar. Its success in the marketplace demonstrated the utility of its design which formed a platform for a considerable amount of modification and development. I'm not disputing the process by which a given design was developed, but what I still find it difficult to understand is the process by which new innovative design came into the marketplace and effectively displaced a previously successful design. I guess the argument about the recumbent is similar although it doesn't dominate the marketplace to the extent of replacing other designs in the same way that the safety bicycle replaced the ordinary.The details of that step-change transition are no doubt somewhere to be found somewhere in the historical record but I've neither come across them directly nor located any secondary sources that document that change in a satisfactory way. I shall keep looking.
> 
> 
> For the latest news, information and events, follow The Glasgow School of Art on line at www.gsa.ac.uk and on Facebook.com/glasgowschoolofart or join the conversation @Twitter.com/gsofa 
> 
> 
> he Glasgow School of Art is a charity registered in Scotland, charity number SC012490.
> 
> 
> 
> This message is intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to us, and immediately and permanently delete it. Do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  
> 
> 
> 
> Any views, opinions or conclusions expressed by an individual in this e-mail do not necessarily reflect the views of The Glasgow School of Art. Since it has been transmitted over a public network, The Glasgow School of Art makes no representation nor accepts any liability for the e-mail’s accuracy or completeness unless expressly stated to the contrary.
> 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager