The Enumerators line was in the spreadsheet you send to vendors for
reports (unless I modified the one I have) , and it is nice to have the
table match up with the underlying paper that provides the feature
descriptions, so I vote for including Enumerator status in the final
table next round.
Cheers,
Bill
On 10/1/12 5:58 AM, Ian Chivers wrote:
> Working on the December edition of Fortran Forum
> We were provided additional information about the Absoft compiler
> by Wood Lotz.
>
> He raised the issue of enum, end enum and enumerations.
> In the John Reid article
>
> ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1601-N1650/N1648.pdf
>
> we have
>
> 2 Data enhancements and object orientation ................ 6
> 2.1 Parameterized derived types .................. 6
> 2.2 Procedure pointers ...................... 7
> 2.3 Finalization......................... 8
> 2.4 Procedures bound by name to a type ............... 9
> 2.5 The PASS attribute...................... 9
> 2.6 Procedures bound to a type as operators ............. 10
> 2.7 Type extension ....................... 10
> 2.8 Overriding a type-bound procedure ............... 11
>
>>>>> 2.9 Enumerations ........................ 12 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> 2.10 ASSOCIATE construct .................... 12
> 2.11 Polymorphic entities ..................... 12
> 2.12 SELECT TYPE construct ................... 13
> 2.13 Deferred bindings and abstract types............... 15
>
> and revision 9 is available
>
> http://www.fortranplus.co.uk/resources/compiler_table_revision_9.pdf
>
> but for some reason this did not make it into the table
> as an entry.
>
> Should we include this as a separate entry?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Ian Chivers
> Jane Sleightholme
>
--
Bill Long [log in to unmask]
Fortran Technical Support & voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142
Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101
|