I wondered about the bibliographical references note here.  In AACR2, I would use [207] since the page doesn't have a number in it, but I know that some places in RDA brackets are not used like in AACR2.  For example, in a 300 you would do "400 unnumbered pages" instead of "[400] p.".


=LDR  01886nam a2200385Ii 4500
=008  121017s2012\\\\enka\\\\\b\\\\001\0\eng\d
=040  \\$aKUK$beng$erda$cKUK
=020  \\$a9781856046954 (paperback)
=020  \\$a1856046958 (paperback)
=050  \4$aZ694$b.W425 2012
=049  \\$aKUKK
=100  1\$aWelsh, Anne,$d1972-,$eauthor.
=245  10$aPractical cataloguing :$bAACR, RDA and MARC 21 /$cAnne Welsh and Sue Batley.
=246  3\$aPractical cataloging
=264  \1$aLondon :$bFacet Publishing,$c2012.
=264  \4$c(c)2012
=300  \\$axvi, 217 pages :$billustrations ;$c24 cm
=336  \\$atext$btxt$2rdacontent
=337  \\$aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
=338  \\$avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
=520  8\$aThis textbook explores how RDA elements can be incorporated into MARC21. Topics include: an introduction to catalogues and cataloguing standards, publication formats and bibliographic elements, access points and headings, a summary which outlines the major issues and many others.
=504  \\$aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 207-211) and index.
=505  0\$aCatalogues and cataloguing standards -- The FRBRization of the catalogue -- Bibliographic elements -- Access points and headings -- RDA: resource description and access -- AACR and RDA -- MARC 21 -- Practical cataloguing : bringing it all together -- The birth of RDA and the death of MARC? -- Examples.
=650  \0$aDescriptive cataloging$vRules.
=650  \0$aFRBR (Conceptual model)
=650  \0$aDescriptive cataloging$vHandbooks, manuals, etc.
=630  00$aResource description & access$vHandbooks, manuals, etc.
=630  00$aAnglo-American cataloguing rules$vHandbooks, manuals, etc.
=650  \0$aMARC formats$vHandbooks, manuals, etc.
=700  1\$aBatley, Sue,$eauthor.