JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CIG-E-FORUM Archives


CIG-E-FORUM Archives

CIG-E-FORUM Archives


CIG-E-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CIG-E-FORUM Home

CIG-E-FORUM Home

CIG-E-FORUM  October 2012

CIG-E-FORUM October 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Record 2 discussion

From:

"Slough, Nick" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Slough, Nick

Date:

Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:12:31 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (85 lines)

Could be either - or both?  There is a work called LCSH - and I don't think RDA covers subjects yet.

Nick Slough 
Assistant Librarian 
Bibliographical Services Section 
City of London Libraries, Archives and Guildhall Art Gallery 
Guildhall Library 
Aldermanbury 
London EC2V 7HH
Tel: 020 7332 1093 
Email: [log in to unmask] 
www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/libraries 

Follow us on Twitter
Read our blog


-----Original Message-----
From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nicky Ransom
Sent: 24 October 2012 11:04
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Record 2 discussion

Is the relationship between the book and LCSH not one of subject, rather than Work?

Nicky Ransom
Data Quality Manager & Cataloguer
University for the Creative Arts
Farnham
GU9 7DS

01252 892739
[log in to unmask]
________________________________________
From: CIG E-Forum [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Garner, Helen J (LIS) [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 24 October 2012 11:01
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Record 2 discussion

I wasn't convinced I needed to do this, but I did feel that the toolkit  at 25.1 was indicating that I should.
Whilst it is a bit obvious in this example, I assume that this would often be the case?
I was also thinking that it would be the kind of data needed in a FRBR-ized catalogue.
Helen


-----Original Message-----
From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Helen Williams
Sent: 24 October 2012 10:49
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Record 2 discussion

Thanks Sandra

Would anyone who included a related work/manifestation feel able to say a bit more about it in relation to this record?
This issue will definitely come up again as I included this field on some of my records, although not on this one.
Had I thought more carefully though, I might have done so!  With the convenience of the user uppermost in our minds, I think it's helpful to provide all the links that we can to related sources.

Helen

-----Original Message-----
From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Sandra Cockburn
Sent: 24 October 2012 10:45
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [CIG-E-FORUM] Record 2 discussion

Re Helen's comments below:

*some of us have included a second 264 field with a (c) date
* some of us (including me!) have included a relationship designator of 'author' - what's the feeling about whether this is necessary on a straightforward record?
* A few people have included related works/manifestations

I wondered if including a second 264 was perhaps taking things a bit too far, so didn't include it.

How important are these relationship designators likely to become further down the road?  If their presence is going to be crucial within the context of the semantic web (!), perhaps we need to be consistent and apply throughout.

Do you have examples of where folks have included related works/manifestations, just to be sure I'm clear on what this means.

Thanks,

Sandra

Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer


THIS E-MAIL AND ANY ATTACHED FILES ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND MAY BE LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete this e-mail. Opinions, advice or facts included in this message are given without any warranties or intention to enter into a contractual relationship with the City of London unless specifically indicated otherwise by agreement, letter or facsimile signed by a City of London authorised signatory. Any part of this e-mail which is purely personal in nature is not authorised by the City of London. All e-mail through the City of London's gateway is potentially the subject of monitoring. All liability for errors and viruses is excluded. Please note that in so far as the City of London falls within the scope of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 or the Environmental Information Regulations 2004, it may need to disclose this e-mail. Website: http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
February 2016
December 2015
September 2015
May 2015
April 2015
November 2014
July 2014
May 2014
February 2014
January 2014
October 2013
August 2013
June 2013
April 2013
October 2012
August 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
September 2011
May 2011
April 2011


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager