Argh! That's almost unbelievable that this is an option for a book with
just 2 authors. I hope we don't see many downloaded records along those
lines or I don't think I'd be able to resist adding to them, even if
they are theoretically 'correct' RDA...
From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of C.J.
Sent: 25 October 2012 15:18
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Record 10 - discussion
> She'd still be in the statement of responsibility though, if you are
> transcribing it as it appears (RDA 22.214.171.124).
Though you also have the option to abridge the statement of
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer