JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CIG-E-FORUM Archives


CIG-E-FORUM Archives

CIG-E-FORUM Archives


CIG-E-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CIG-E-FORUM Home

CIG-E-FORUM Home

CIG-E-FORUM  October 2012

CIG-E-FORUM October 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Comments on issues raised on Day 1

From:

"C.J. Carty" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

C.J. Carty

Date:

Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:32:52 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (62 lines)

Thank you Alan, your comments throughout the e-forum have all been 
extremely useful.

Celine

On Oct 25 2012, Danskin, Alan wrote:

> AACR2
> 
>Integrating resource
> 
>A new description is required when an integrating resource is re-based,
>1.6.3.3.  This means, when the whole content is reissued.  In the case
>of  AACR2 the 2002 Revision warrants a new description as it was
>re-based in 2002. Subsequent updates or iterations are recorded by
>editing that description.  This includes changes affecting
>identification of the work (6.1.3.3) which are reflected by amending the
>authorised access point representing the work.  
> 
>Superseded titles are recorded as  Earlier title proper - MARC =247
>Earlier Title.
> 
>There is some debate about the best way of recording the date of
>publication (this is a coding isssue not an RDA issue), The question is
>whether to upate the currect 264 $c to reflect the date of the most
>recent update.  This seems logical to me...
> 
>Editorial responsibility for AACR rests with the Joint Steering
>Committee for Revision of AACR, making them the creator.
> 
>I would certainly  give authorised access points for the na\tional
>associations (ALA; CLA and CIILIP)  who own AACR2, with  relationship
>issuing body, but note BL is currently trying to clear up some ambiguity
>regarding this relationship designator..
> 
>I would not give authorised access points on the description for the
>2002 revision from Gorman and Winkler, but I would record the
>relationsbip to the the 2nd Edition.-- as an unstructured  description
>(or note, as we used to call them)
> 
>Multiple publishers
> 
>2.8.4.5 If there is more than one publisher record them in the order
>indicated by sequence,layout or typography; the core requirement is to
>record the first only.  So either record
> 
>American Library Association; Canadian Library Association; Facet
>Publishing for Chartered Institute of Library and Information
>Professionals
> 
>or just the core requirement
> 
>American Library Association
> 
>

-- 
CÚline Carty
English Cataloguing
Cambridge University Library
Cambridge CB3 9DR

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
February 2016
December 2015
September 2015
May 2015
April 2015
November 2014
July 2014
May 2014
February 2014
January 2014
October 2013
August 2013
June 2013
April 2013
October 2012
August 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
September 2011
May 2011
April 2011


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager