Would anyone who included a related work/manifestation feel able to say
a bit more about it in relation to this record?
This issue will definitely come up again as I included this field on
some of my records, although not on this one.
Had I thought more carefully though, I might have done so! With the
convenience of the user uppermost in our minds, I think it's helpful to
provide all the links that we can to related sources.
From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Sent: 24 October 2012 10:45
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [CIG-E-FORUM] Record 2 discussion
Re Helen's comments below:
*some of us have included a second 264 field with a (c) date
* some of us (including me!) have included a relationship designator of
'author' - what's the feeling about whether this is necessary on a
* A few people have included related works/manifestations
I wondered if including a second 264 was perhaps taking things a bit too
far, so didn't include it.
How important are these relationship designators likely to become
further down the road? If their presence is going to be crucial within
the context of the semantic web (!), perhaps we need to be consistent
and apply throughout.
Do you have examples of where folks have included related
works/manifestations, just to be sure I'm clear on what this means.
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer