This is a good point. I originally had included a series entry for this record. But I hadn't taken it from the information we had in hand. It looked like part of a series, and I hunted round elsewhere until I found which one.
However, in the light of LCPS 2.12, which mentions distinguishing between phrases which are true series, and those which are not, I deleted it.
This runs into record 7 as well, where I ended up keeping my series entry because in that instance the back cover said 'another ed in the highly successful M-libraries series' and 126.96.36.199 had made me think I could take the information from anywhere on the resource...
From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kathleen Goldfarb
Sent: 25 October 2012 11:00
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Record 6 - discussion
Somewhere I found what I considered a series statement- Virtual reference desk series. Since there was no LC authority record, I put it in a 490 0 untraced (I see that so seldom these days, not sure it is really an option)
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer