JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CIG-E-FORUM Archives


CIG-E-FORUM Archives

CIG-E-FORUM Archives


CIG-E-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CIG-E-FORUM Home

CIG-E-FORUM Home

CIG-E-FORUM  October 2012

CIG-E-FORUM October 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Discussion of record 2

From:

Tabitha Driver <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Tabitha Driver <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:38:21 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (53 lines)

Those were the things that struck me too, and in fact things I wasn't sure about as I catalogued. It seemed to me that -

  *   copyright statement only core if year of publication not identified
  *   "author" not necessary for creator relationship designator? RDA I.2 "If the element used to record the relationship (e.g., creator) is considered sufficient for the purposes of the agency creating the data, do not use a relationship designator to indicate the specific nature of the relationship."

I would think that the relationship between works is clearer though - isn't this a guide to LCSH?



What do others think?



Tabitha Driver



________________________________
From: Helen Williams [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 24 October 2012 10:31
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [CIG-E-FORUM] Discussion of record 2

Thank you to everyone who has submitted a version of record 2.
Itís time to open up discussion on anything youíd like to raise.  Itís going to be very useful to talk about the differences we see in records, and on some issues we may be able to come to consensus, while other areas will remain open to interpretation!  Any comments we make wonít be criticisms of differences in records, so please feel free to discuss.

A few things Iíve noticed to start us offÖ

*some of us have included a second 264 field with a © date
* some of us (including me!) have included a relationship designator of Ďauthorí Ė whatís the feeling about whether this is necessary on a straightforward record?
* A few people have included related works/manifestations

Plenty of other differences too, so letís open the discussion

Helen
Helen Williams
Assistant Librarian, Bibliographic Services

LSE Library Services
The London School of Economics and Political Science
10 Portugal Street
London WC2A 2HD

[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
020 7955 7234


Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer

________________________________

Quakers say: Each person is unique, precious, a child of God.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
February 2016
December 2015
September 2015
May 2015
April 2015
November 2014
July 2014
May 2014
February 2014
January 2014
October 2013
August 2013
June 2013
April 2013
October 2012
August 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
September 2011
May 2011
April 2011


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager