This is an interesting point. I think RDA instructs to take the details in the order supplied or given most importance (can someone confirm?!) so that would mean being in the US shouldn't make any difference as it would have done in AACR2...
From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kathleen Goldfarb
Sent: 24 October 2012 13:59
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Record 5
I added the info about Neil-Schuman as a second 264 and a note that the book was first published in the US. I took that from typeface on the document. Since I am in the US, should Neal Schuman have been listed first?
This is record 5 by the Uni of Warwick team. We had the following issues:
Copyright being held by ALA - did this need recording in the 264?
The related manifestation in the form of the American edition. We record it in the note field, but this doesn't tell us about GI relationship No relationship for poor old Roy Tennant
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer