JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CIG-E-FORUM Archives


CIG-E-FORUM Archives

CIG-E-FORUM Archives


CIG-E-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CIG-E-FORUM Home

CIG-E-FORUM Home

CIG-E-FORUM  October 2012

CIG-E-FORUM October 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Discussion of record 4

From:

Helen Williams <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask][log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:57:00 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (81 lines)

This is a really interesting point.  My preference would be not to abridge as well, though as a non-NACO library although it adds to our authority work, it doesn't have the impact that it does for a NACO library.  

Although I hope to be able to accept incoming records 'as is', if they are acceptable RDA core records', I still need to think through the implications of having some acceptable records which don't conform to local policy, as this could be an issue particularly in terms of discoverability and OPAC display.  I'd be interested to know what others are thinking as well.   

Helen 

-----Original Message-----
From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of C.J. Carty
Sent: 24 October 2012 12:32
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Discussion of record 4

Yes, this is something we're having discussions about now. Our preference is not to abridge (either in transcription or in access points) but it does add to authority work (we are NACO contributors).

Also, whatever we decide as our local policy, we also need to figure out whether we would edit/amend downloaded records to follow that if they did abridge. This is a big issue, especially given the volume of extra checking and editing this might involve. The same question (about whether we want to edit incoming records to match local policy decisions even if they are otherwise perfectly acceptable records meeting RDA core requirements) is a much broader issue we haven't yet settled.

Celine


On Oct 24 2012, Garner, Helen J (LIS) wrote:

> I included all editors in this record (rather than abridge), but I 
> think we will have to make a local decision on what we actually do. I 
> have a concern about the impact on name authority maintenance. Helen
>
> From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of 
> Helen Williams Sent: 24 October 2012 12:03 To: 
> [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Discussion of record 4
>
> Looking at the notes in Debbie's record has reminded me of a good 
> point to make on this record - in all the records I've looked at so 
> far I think we've all made the decision to enter all 4 editors, rather 
> than use the option to abridge.
>
> Also, what do people think about relationship designators here. I was 
> unsure whether to use editor, or editor of compilation.
>
>Helen
>
> From: CIG E-Forum
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]<mailto:[mailto:CIG-E-FORUM@JISCMAI
> L.AC.UK]> On Behalf Of Helen Williams Sent: 24 October 2012 12:00 To:
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> Subject: 
> [CIG-E-FORUM] Discussion of record 4
>
>Let's kick off discussion of record 4 before lunchtime.
>
> Did anyone else add a related work for 'In series: Principles and 
> practice in records management and archives' I wasn't quite sure how 
> to format this either.
>
>Helen
>
>Helen Williams
>Assistant Librarian, Bibliographic Services
>
>LSE Library Services
>The London School of Economics and Political Science
>10 Portugal Street
>London WC2A 2HD
>
>[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>020 7955 7234
>
>
> Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic 
> communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer
>
> Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic 
> communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer
>

--
CÚline Carty
English Cataloguing
Cambridge University Library
Cambridge CB3 9DR

Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
February 2016
December 2015
September 2015
May 2015
April 2015
November 2014
July 2014
May 2014
February 2014
January 2014
October 2013
August 2013
June 2013
April 2013
October 2012
August 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
September 2011
May 2011
April 2011


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager