I can't see this in RDA 2.8.4. Am I missing something?
Hebrew & Jewish Studies Librarian
UCL Library Services
University College London
London WC1E 6BT
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7679 2598 (Internal ext. 32598)
Fax: +44 (0) 20 7679 7373
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
**Please remember the environment and only print this if necessary**
From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of C.J. Carty
Sent: 24 October 2012 11:47
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] DISCUSSION record 3
On Oct 24 2012, Nicky Ransom wrote:
> I suppose National Archives has a relationship to the manifestation,
> rather than the work, and then the only option in the RDA Appendix is
> "Broadcaster", which clearly isn't right! I probably wouldn't give
> them an entry as they are part of the publication statement and Facet
> don't get an added entry, but I'm happy to be corrected!
I went and checked rules because I wanted to justify my transcription of National Archives in the publisher statement too. I'm including it in publisher based on 2.8.4, though this is optional and it's only core RDA to have the first named publisher.
As regards the access point, I think that there's a rule for including publisher as corporate body with relationhip to the manifestation in 21.3 that I feel justifies giving an access point. However, I completely agree that the only relationship designator listed for this in the Appendix is "broadcaster" which definitely doesn't work.