JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CIG-E-FORUM Archives


CIG-E-FORUM Archives

CIG-E-FORUM Archives


CIG-E-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CIG-E-FORUM Home

CIG-E-FORUM Home

CIG-E-FORUM  October 2012

CIG-E-FORUM October 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: DISCUSSION record 3

From:

Nicky Ransom <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Nicky Ransom <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:54:36 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (33 lines)

Having just had another look, I can see what you mean about the instruction in 21.3 to record publisher if considered important. As there is no obvious relationship designator, I guess we could either construct one (publisher?) or not put one in at all (18.4 talks about using relationship designators to "indicate the nature of the relationship more specifically than is indicated by the defined scope of the element itself"). Although not putting anything doesn't seem very satisfactory.

 Nicky

________________________________________
From: C.J. Carty [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of C.J. Carty [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 24 October 2012 11:46
To: Nicky Ransom
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] DISCUSSION record 3

On Oct 24 2012, Nicky Ransom wrote:

> I suppose National Archives has a relationship to the manifestation,
> rather than the work, and then the only option in the RDA Appendix is
> "Broadcaster", which clearly isn't right! I probably wouldn't give them
> an entry as they are part of the publication statement and Facet don't
> get an added entry, but I'm happy to be corrected!

I went and checked rules because I wanted to justify my transcription of
National Archives in the publisher statement too. I'm including it in
publisher based on 2.8.4, though this is optional and it's only core RDA to
have the first named publisher.

As regards the access point, I think that there's a rule for including
publisher as corporate body with relationhip to the manifestation in 21.3
that I feel justifies giving an access point. However, I completely agree
that the only relationship designator listed for this in the Appendix is
"broadcaster" which definitely doesn't work.

Celine

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
February 2016
December 2015
September 2015
May 2015
April 2015
November 2014
July 2014
May 2014
February 2014
January 2014
October 2013
August 2013
June 2013
April 2013
October 2012
August 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
September 2011
May 2011
April 2011


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager