On Oct 24 2012, Nicky Ransom wrote:
> Re: Relationship designator for Ross Spencer. I originally put editor,
> but I see now that's probably not right, as he has written a chapter,
> according to the TOC. Therefore, he ought to be an author, I think.
It's still problematic isn't it, because other authors of chapter (I didn't
think to look at the TOC I must admit) didn't get a 700 so he's getting it
because of the t.p. wording saying he made contributions... I am unsure
what is the right thing to do but think he probably is a creator (though
not a principal creator) and so probably does need $e author. It somehow
seems unsatisfactory though. And the National Archives one even more so.