Jennie
Just checked DCRM(B) (it's on my desk at the moment!) - yes you list everyone with an option to limit to 3 if 'considered too numerous to list exhaustively'
Katrina
-----Original Message-----
From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Kelly - Librarian
Sent: 25 October 2012 10:45
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Record 6 - schoolboy error
I already include all the authors (and always have) because I tend to get asked for "everything X has written" by my users quite a lot so I found I was creating more work for myself by using the "et al" rule.
I think it's quite common in rare books libraries generally to put all of them in, is it in DCRM(B)? (Too many rules, too many acronyms!!)
Jennie K
Librarian
North of England Institute of Mining and Mechanical Engineers
Neville Hall
Westgate Road
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE1 1SE
-----Original Message-----
From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Helen Williams
Sent: 25 October 2012 10:34
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Record 6 - schoolboy error
But that's a helpful distinction to draw out between AACR2 and RDA - thanks Wendy!
And I'm interested that some have chosen to list all the names while others have chosen to use [and 5 others]. Has anyone thought very much about local policy on this point?
Helen
-----Original Message-----
From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wendy Taylor
Sent: 25 October 2012 10:31
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [CIG-E-FORUM] Record 6 - schoolboy error
Bother - I put [et al] by mistake out of habit!
Wendy (RNIB)
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.
|