Again, I'm unable to participate fully in the day because of meetings.
However, going back to record 6, if I may, was anyone tempted by RDA
22.214.171.124 (Optional Omission), recording the edition statement as
'edited by R. David Lankes (and five others)? Personally, I think I'd
want to record all names listed if I was cataloguing this for real but
thought I'd tackle this example slightly differently. Perhaps I was
feeling pressured for time when I catalogued this one ...
My apologies if this has been debated already today - I haven't
managed to read all the threads on record 6, and my apologies if I've
mis-interpreted this rule completely!
Oxford Brookes University