A 20.2 contributor seems to me to be more concerned with bringing the Expression into being in whatever form it takes (RDA 20.2.1.1), whereas a 19.2 creator creates original work in the first place. If editors are (effectively) arranging chapters written by other people, then I would view them as contributors, rather than creators.

I guess it depends how much original input the editors have. 

HelenD.



Helen Doyle
Assistant Librarian
 
Royal Academy of Dance
36 Battersea Square
London
SW11 3RA
0207 326 8032


>>> Helen Williams <[log in to unmask]> 10/24/2012 12:32 pm >>>
I thought we were at the Work level because an aggregate work had been
compiled which effectively resulted in the creation of a new work. What
do others think?

  

Also, although in MARC the editors would go in 700 fields, in the
non-MARC format, do people see them fitting in 19.2 creator (which is
where I ended up putting them) or 20.2 contributor?

I was rather unsure about this.

Helen 

 

From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Freedman, Vanessa
Sent: 24 October 2012 12:27
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Discussion of record 4

 

Or are the individual chapters "expressions" and the compilation a
"manifestation" (still can't get my head round FRBR)?

 

Vanessa

 

Vanessa Freedman

Hebrew & Jewish Studies Librarian

UCL Library Services

University College London

Gower Street

London WC1E 6BT

 

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7679 2598 (Internal ext. 32598) 

Fax: +44 (0) 20 7679 7373

E-mail: [log in to unmask] 

Website: www.ucl.ac.uk/library 

 

**Please remember the environment and only print this if necessary**

 

 

From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Amies, Paul
Sent: 24 October 2012 12:09
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Discussion of record 4

 

I used "compiler", although looking now at the definition of a compiler
that doesn't seem quite right.

I think I was determined to select something from I.2 (associated with
work) as it didn't seem right to use something from I.3 (associated with
an expression), as surely we are at the level of "work" here?

 

-- 

Paul Amies

Cataloguer

UCL Library Services

University College London

Gower Street

London 

WC1E 6BT

 

Tel: +44 (0)20 7679 2204 (Internal ext: 32204)

 

E-mail: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> 

 

From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Helen
Williams
Sent: 24 October 2012 12:03
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Discussion of record 4

 

Looking at the notes in Debbie's record has reminded me of a good point
to make on this record - in all the records I've looked at so far I
think we've all made the decision to enter all 4 editors, rather than
use the option to abridge.

 

Also, what do people think about relationship designators here.  I was
unsure whether to use editor, or editor of compilation.

 

Helen 

 

From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Helen
Williams
Sent: 24 October 2012 12:00
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: [CIG-E-FORUM] Discussion of record 4

 

Let's kick off discussion of record 4 before lunchtime.

 

Did anyone else add a related work for 'In series: Principles and
practice in records management and archives'

I wasn't quite sure how to format this either.

 

Helen 

 

Helen Williams

Assistant Librarian, Bibliographic Services

 

LSE Library Services

The London School of Economics and Political Science

10 Portugal Street

London WC2A 2HD

 

[log in to unmask] 

020 7955 7234

 


Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic
communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer 


Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic
communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer 


Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer