I agree that he's added written work and so is more of an author than a contributor, but the fact that he's not just listed as a third author is surely relevant somehow?
Did we get anywhere on whether Spencer's is a different kind of responsibility? I seem to recall RDA rather doing away with the concept of mixed responsibility.
HelenD.
Helen Doyle
Assistant Librarian
Royal Academy of Dance
36 Battersea Square
London
SW11 3RA
0207 326 8032
>>> Jenny Wright <[log in to unmask]> 10/24/2012 11:43 am >>>
I thought that "author" was the appropriate relationship designator for
Ross Spencer - even though he's not as'important' to the creation of the
work as the other two authors, it seemed to me that he added written
content of the work and was therefore author.
Sponsoring body was the best I could up with for National Archives as a
710$e, though I felt it wasn't completely right.
I'm sorry I haven't submitted records - I've created them in our inhouse
system as it's important for me to deal with RDA in MARC, and there's no
sensible way to share a view. There's also lots of shortcuts in the
system, so they wouldn't 'look' right anyway.
Jenny Wright
Development Manager
Bibliographic Data Services Ltd.
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
|